rl.)oHanfiiii Svi^aitimerdami M. D. VT BT{1 MVLj£i^iS Fa- 
trica -i una cum Methodo nova Cavitates corporis ita pr^paran^ 
di, ut fuam femper geminam faciem fervent. Lugduni Batav. 
i 6/2» in 
^' i^^ri ^ Publiflier of thefe Trades thinks himfelf obliged in a 
j[ particular manner CO do right to the Learned Au[hor of 
tbis Book, as well upon the account of the matter contained 
thereiOjas his bbhging way of dedicating it by a Letter of June 
I4v 167%. to the Royal Society \ in the doing whereof he (hews 
Kimfeli fo generous and candid, as notwithftandiog the pre- 
fent Rupture between the two Nations, England.snd the Vni- 
ted Provinces (o( which latter he is a Subjeft) he fcruples not 
foleninly to acknowledge, Nefcire fe to give yoi^his own 
words ) quo faBum fit fato^ ut , quemadmodum ChrifHanus 
Orbis noh minima }{eligionis [uce incrementa Angltca genti dtbef; jta 
ultimis difficiUimifqne his temporibus apudEam invent a fit ratio ^qudy 
mi^s inanibus Scbolajlicorum difputationibm^bon^ artes ^ [dentin 
in folido locentur : ^od ipfum utnoh poftremam gloria Britannic(s 
fcirtem abfol'vit^iia in caufa ejfe zit^ut in Naturalis Philofophia nego^ 
tio ad nuBkm aliud quam Regije Societatis Tribunal provocare vel 
aupt veldebeat^ 
But to pafs to the particulars of the matter it felf) they are 
chiefly, two rA^^^ upon the Prodromus of that fa- 
mous 'Anat-broift D^ Joh. VrnMorrie, printed 1668 5 treating de 
pmtiyus\6enerati(mis iniitroque [^^ tjotp which he adds fuch 
thingsashimfelfhad obfervedon thatfubjedt^ not allowing 
to the laid FanMorne,thQitih^Sperrmtic\ Artery hnh no cavity^ 
denymg the iy^erw^^^/V^F^?» to agree any waies with the 
Scheme of 0e Gr^^i/"^ aJSrining the pioceffes of the peritona^ 
um inmen aiid women not to go beyond the inguina^ obferviog 
that TSe Graaf is not well acquainted with the duUus of the veins 
and arteries in tefliculis 5 doubting yctjwherejand how the vafi, 
te^icularia do unite with the pr^eparantia 5 denying, that the 
fame vafa tefiicularia have a connexion with the duHtis Highmo^ 
r/Vi«?^jand affirming tjhem to be continued with the Epidtdymu'^ 
denying iikewife^that'thc tfdfa defer entia have a communication 
with 
