(*4) 
be none of the ftrongeft, taketh occafion to let the world fee, 
that they are not more efteem'd in Italy, thm in other places. 
frediy in behalf oiRiccioli, endeavours to anfwer the Obje&ions 
of Angeli, and this latter replyes to Manfredi's Anfwer. The 
fubftance of their difcourfe is this following. 
Although the Arguments of Riccioli be many, yet the ftrength 
of them confifts chiefly in thefe three : 
The fr/t. 
Multa corpora gravia t dimiffa per Aerem, in Piano v£quatoris 
txiflentem, defender ent ad Terr am cum Velocitatis Incremento 
reali & notabili, & non tantum apparenti. Sed (i tellus mover etur 
motu diurno tantum circa Jui centrum, nulla corpora gravia, dimiffa 
per Aerem, in Piano *ALquatoris exifientem, defcenderent ad Terr am 
- cum velocitatis incremento reali ac notabili, fed tantum cum appa- 
rent. B k Tellus aut non movetur, aut non movetur diurno tantum 
motu. 
V The fecond. 
Si Tellus mover etur -motu \ diurno^ aut etiam annuo, multb debi- 
lior eftkt iffus Globi bombardici explofi in Septentrionem aut Meri- 
diem flu am ab Occident e in Orient em. At confequens efifalfum. E. 
& antecedent. 
The third. 
Si Tellus diurna revolutione mover etur, Globus argMaceus un- 
a arum 8 # ex alt it u dint ' Romanorum pedum 240. pgr aerem quiet urn 
dimi(fw,obliquo defcenfu.in Terr am delaberetur abfque incremento 
realt ac phyfico velocitatis, vel cert e nunquani tanto, quanta eft 
proportiopercuftonis ac foni per cafum ex ditta altitudine faiii. 
Sedpofierius efi abfurdum* E.&prius. 
f n Anfiver to the fr$ of thefe Arguments, Angela denieth the 
Minor > which Riccioli pretendsto- prove thus - 5 : 
Si 
