position (transversely across the epigastrium) where tlie liver 
was usually put and the liver was foundin the région (vertically 
in the right side ) o£ the abdomen usually occupied by the 
intestines. 
There can be absolutely no doubt that the persons who em- 
balmed thèse bodies, deliberately and of set purpose put Amset 
with the liver and not Kahhsenuf] as Pettigrew stated. It is 
worthy o£ note in this connection that when Mr. Quibell and I 
unrolled the contents o£ a Canopic Jar o£ Thua (mother o£ 
Amenhotep III 's wi£e) we found the liver in the Kabhsenuf Jar. 
Whether this is sufficient to justify us in supporting Pettigrew's 
statement so £ar as the new Empire is concerned must remain an 
opeu question for the présent : l)ut it seems most improbable that, 
i£ this be so, they should have suddenly changed the association 
o£ the Genii and the viscera. 
Ilapi was associated with the lung (? le£t) or lungs in eight 
(or possibly nine") out o£ fourteen cases, with the stomach in one 
(or possibly three), with intestine in two cases and the liver in 
one. I£ we could be more sure of the identity o£ the lung in 
every case the proportion of cases associated with Ha}>i would 
almost certainly rise, because it is precisely the best preserved 
examples which have provided us with the eight cases. 
launmutef was certainly associated with the stomach in two 
cases and almost certainly in four others ; in five cases with pièces 
o£ intestine which might possibly be stomach or have been mis- 
taken for stomach ; with the liver in one case and a lung in one 
(or possibly three) cases. It is worthy of note that it was 
precisely in those two cases in which the organs were best pre- 
served that the stomach was recognised, which suggests that the 
great difïiculty in identifying this viscus is the real cause of the 
seeming irregularity in its association. 
Kabhsenuf was associated with intestines in eight cases, with 
