( 5 J8 ) 
having much the fame Figuration of Parts , for the 
fame ufes, as the Wings of Birds for Flying : And 
the variety of the internal Parts depends upon the 
Quality of the Nouriihnient or Nature of the place 
where they live, or other Circumftances : Inftan- 
cing in fome^ he fays, the Oeconomy is neverthelefs 
much the fam.e ; next he anfwers his Citations out 
of Hippocrates and concludes this fecond part with 
anfwering the Opponents Dilemma , ^hich is this, 
Zootomy is either for compleating natural Hiftory, 
and then belongs to the Phiiofopher, or for the bet- 
ter Attainment of the Cure of Difeafes; but fince 
by it m new Medicines are found out, neither can it 
be ufeful to the Phyfician any way. After the Anfwer 
to this, he (hews , that the Moderns have net been 
wanting in their OWervations and Experiments on the 
Humors of the Body , and inferts his own upon the 
Blood ; and fo comes to handle the lift part, concern- 
Dendranatome \ which our Author confefTes was not 
profecuted by- himlelf or others, upon the Account 
of the Pradice of Phyfick, or thereby to find out 
new Remedies : But for the Cultivation of that part 
of Natural Knowledge, which before was but little 
known. And fliews, that Galen and others did the 
fame ; Then he defends his Compairing fome of the 
Parts of Plants with thofe of Animals , tho' others 
might have extended this too far, as Montalhanm Mi* 
zalduiy &c, provres in the next place, the Difcove- 
ries that have been made in the Strufture of Plants 
by Microfcopes , and to what purpofe ; and adds 
that Dendranatome may, tho' more remotely, advance 
even the Prafiice of Phyfick, by the Difcovery of the. 
Oeconomy of Plants, as from the Generation of Galls;, 
he Explicates the Caufe of Puftles and Tubercles rifing 
up in Animals. After this he fliews the Difquifition 
