( 121 ) 
though the general Confent of all Authors had brands 
it with the Note of a F^tiJ ftinking Animal. But at the 
fame rime, I inftanccdj that in the richcO: Perfumes we 
have, as Mask, Civet ^ and Amhergriefe^ the fame is ob- 
ferved ; and coat Paffagc 1 quoted in Gul. Pifo (dd) con- 
cerning Amhergriefe^ is ve y remarkable. 
Upon looking over this part of my Account of the Ta* 
jacu^ I find this Faflage {cc)\ And I am apt to think, 
'twas by xtmov'm^i\:it{Q. Scent 'Bags ^ rather than ta- 
king away the Kidneys, tiiat chey made the Saragoy 
•^editie,- which, otherwife ftank lo much, that ihe 
''Barbarous Nations refuied tifem ; as out of Lerius^ 
" jQh. Faler ice) takes notice. Job. I^rtus his Words 
are chele, as he is printed in Theodore de Bry {ff) alia 
etiam invenitur {Eejlid) quam Saragoy appellant^ qu<e oh 
f<etorem a Bar bar is non comeditur, nos^ ant em quibufdam 
excoriatis^ & detracla Renum pinguedine, unde f£tor i/le 
manebat, fine fajlzdio edimus^ carne enim cum tenera^ turn 
opHmaeft, And I find my ConjecSure was not amift 
tor alchough then -T knew not where i\Y\:i Scent- Bug 
placed, yet now I find it was the Marfupium, or Pouch ; 
and thax Lerius was altogether miftakeo in attributing 
this F^tor to the Kidneys^ or the f.^^^ about them ; for I 
could not fmell any thing ungrateful, or ill fcented 
there. 
Upon this Occafion, I can*t but make a farther Re- 
mark upon the Scent Bag the /^^j^ i^^e-r which is 
likewife placed in the Belly near tht Navil, md makes a 
large God. Lmcoj Schrockiia (gg) has wrote a diftinft 
Treatife about it; to w'hom I ihall refer my Reader. 
But though there is this Analogy between our Pofummd 
(dd J De Indlx utriufqv re Nat. & Med. lib. i. p.m. 17. (ee) Hiftor. 
Mexican. 658. fff ) Americ, pan tertk p. 180. (gg) Hiftoria Mofchi, 
- • T the 
