60 Nebraska Agricultural Exp. Station, Research Bui. 10 
schedules for both plats 1 and 5 was for some unaccountable reason 
considerably higher than for the corresponding plats in table 37. 
Table 39 — Beatrice spray schedule 
Date 
Spray 
April 24 
Cluster-bud 
May 5 
Petal-fall 
May 25 
1 4-day s 
June 7 
21 -days 
June 21 
3 5-day s 
Aug. 10 
2d-brood 
Plat 1 
BX-4-4-5C 
LS-1. 01 
LS-1. 01 
LS-1. 01 
LS-1. 01 
LS-1.009 
LS-1.009 
LS-1.009 
LS-1 . 009 
LS-1 . 009 
LS-1.0C9 
BX-4-4-5C 
Bx-4-4-50 
Bx-4-4-50 
Bx-4-4-50 
Bx-4-4-50 
Bx-4-4-50 
2 

3 
Bx-4-4-50 
4 
LS-1 . 009 
LS-1.009 
Bx-4-4-50 
5 
Blotch injury on windfalls and picked fruit 
Variety 
Plat 
Total 
fruit 
Blotch 
Per cent 
blotch 
Spray 
injury 
Per cent 
spray 
injury 
Ben Davis . . . . ^ 
Mo. Pippin 
Ben Davis 
Mo. Pippin 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
check 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
check 
11 
2 
13 
24 
5 
check 
2,112 
224 
10.60 
551 
26.09 
4,711 
2 
.04 
606 
12.86 
1,727 
6,853 
217 
2,217 
12.56 
32.35 
58 
3.36 
2,084 
1,067 
5,966 
2,112 
32 
230 
3,320 
224 
1.54 
21.55 
55.65 
10.60 
159 
48 
7.63 
4.50 
551 
26.09 
4,711 
2,084 
2,794 
12,819 
2 
32 
447 
5,537 
.04 
1.54 
16.00 
43.20 
606 
159 
106 
12.86 
7.63 
3.79 
The results shown in table 39 are quite similar to those of 
the two preceding tables. In this case, however, the 21-days 
spray shows an efficiency of 100 per cent and practically as rauch 
is shown for the 35-days spray, but the 14-days spray permitted 
some infection. The writer is of the opinion that infection did 
not take place until after the 14-days spray, and the Bordeaux, 
being effective for a longer period than lime sulphur, prevented 
infection. It is very probable that some infection occurred on 
plat 4 before the spray was put on. 
iNo Mo. Pippin. 
2No Ben Davis. 
