vine: classifications of cyclostomatous polyzoa. 
359 
Tuberciilipora, New genus. 
„ VI. — Cameraporidse, N. Fam. Camerapora ,, 
I have arranged the family grouping with its inchided genera 
as above, only to the extent of the published details of these respected 
authors. It is fair to state, however, that Messrs. Pergens & D. 
Meunier are still carrying on their investigations, and how far they 
may modify, or restrict their grouping in future labours, I am not in 
a position to judge. The authors are in earnest with their work, and 
I believe we shall have some good papers from them on Faxae Lime- 
stone, and other forms. 
In his latest Pal^eontological Paper'"' on Tertiary Cyclostomata 
from New Zealand, Mr. A W. Waters has given us the result of his 
more matured views respecting the divisions of this Sub-order, and 
we may regard this as a supplement to his previous paper on the 
Cyclostomata from Australia.! I know full well that the attention 
of Mr. Waters has been directed to the grouping of the Cyclostomata 
for many years, and we may, therefore, regard this paper as the out- 
come of many years of thought. As Mr. Waters says lOp. c. p. 337), 
" The second part of Mr. Busk's Report is a gTeat disappointment 
.... as only thirty-three species are recorded, and these are for 
the most part well known and common. In fact, the results of this 
great expedition do not seem, so far as the Cyclostomata are con- 
cerned, to exceed what I presume a specialist might, after a storm, 
VIII. — Fasciculiporida?. 
VII. — Fasciporidne. 
IX. — Heteroporidae. 
X — Lichenoporidae. 
Clausacamerapora ,, 
Curvacamerapora 
Fungella. 
Supercytis, D'Orbigny. 
Cyrtopora. 
Truncatula. 
Heteropora. 
Lichenopora. 
Discoporella. 
Radiopora. 
* Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc, Aug. 1887, pp. 337-350. 
t Q. J. G. Soc, Vol. 40, 188^, pp. 674-090. 
