ADDENDA. 
The following further notes are necessitated through my having overlooked a 
paper of Mr. Butler's in the Ann. and Mag. N. H. on some Australian species, 
which somewhat affects the synonymy in a few cases in my catalogue : — 
LYCiENIDiE. 
LampideS Palemon 9 Or. (p. 83). Butler, A. and M. N. H. 
(5) ix. p. 85 (1882). Melbourne. 
I had regarded this as a reputed species only, but as this is the second 
recorded instance of its occurrence in Australia, it must be now 
included in the list. 
HESPEBIXDiE. 
Page so.— Hesperilla Flammeata, Butl {Tel. F.), A. and 
M. N. H. (5) ix. p. 85 (1882). 
This is, I think, undoubtedly = H. Donnysa ; the distinctions are too 
trivial, especially being drawn from a single example of the former. 
Page 81— H. Eclipsis, Butl. {Tel. JE.) 6% A. and M. N. H. (5) 
ix. p. 86 (1882). 
This is = Atromacula (miki), which latter name will, of course, have to 
sink.' 
Page 81— H. Compacta, Butl {Tel C.) <?, A. and M. K H. 
(5) ix. p. 87 (1882). 
This is = Scepticalis, Rosen., which name also gives way. 
Page 82— Taractrocera Papyria, Bois. {Sesp. P.) Butler, 
A. and M. N. H. (5) ix. p. 87 (1882). Melbourne. 
It is possible that my Apaustus Minimus (p. 77) may be identical with the 
species intended by Bois.; it is certainly the only insect with which I 
am acquainted that will answer to his description — a rather crude 
one, only remotely even giving a clue to its size. If this sliould prove 
to be the case, it cannot remain in the genus Taractrocera, the 
antennae of Minimus, as also of Agraulia, being distinctly hooked. 
And touching Agraulia, this may be the same insect as described by 
Godart under the name of Flavovittata, of late included in the genus 
Taractrocera; at any rate, it is the nearest one I know to his 
description, although it seems strange that so experienced a lepi- 
dopterist as Hewitson should have overlooked Godart's species. If 
this be so, Tepper's Hesperilla Bifasciata will stand as a species, 
as it certainly is not = Agraulia. 
