HISTORY OF BOTANY. 
LECTURE XLIV. 
HISTORY OF BOTANY FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY TU 
THE TIME OF LINN^US. 
We have now traced the progress of botanical knowledge, from 
the earliest periods of the world, to the discovery of America. 
About this time, botanic gardens began to be cultivated ; these af- 
forded new opportunities for investigation, by comprehending the 
vegetables of all countries within such limits as enabled the botanist 
to compare them, and to watch their growth and different stages of 
development. 
From the days of Theophrastus until the beginning of the 16tli 
century. Botany, instead of becoming more perfect, had been ren- 
dered more obscure. This was not owing to want of attention or 
labour, but to the false rules of philosophy which had so long i)re- 
vailed. 
At length the cause of the evil seemed to be discovered. Many 
writers protested against the erroneous opinions of their times ; they 
said, " our bhnd respect for the ancients is an insurmountable ob- 
stacle to the progress of Botany. We expect to find everywhere the 
plants of Theophrastus, Dioscorides, and Pliny ; whereas they did 
not know one hundredth part of the plants which cover the globe. 
The first of them never went out of Greece ; the second left only un- 
connected notes, treating without order upon the medicinal qualities 
of plants ; and Phny copied these notes without comment or criti- 
cism. We cannot apply to the plants of Germany or France, the 
names under which the ancients described those of Italy, Greece, and 
Asia ; before studying the plants of foreign countries, we ought to 
know those of our own. Of what use are^ disputes about the nature 
and qualities of species, when we are not able to distinguish one from 
another ? The true method of doing this, is to explore the plains, 
valleys, and mountains, to examine and compare the plants of our 
own and foreign countries. Libraries alone are insufficient to make 
botanists." 
These reflections led to a happy revolution, not only in this sci- 
ence, but in all others ; it may be called the era of true philosophy.* 
Yet the principles which were now discovered, were not much ap- ^ 
plied to science until the time of Bacon, Newton, Linnaeus, and 
Locke ; and it remained for the late Dr. Thomas Brown, of Edin- 
burgh, to show that Ihe human mind itself is subject to the same 
general laws of inquiry which now regulate investigations in the 
physical sciences. 
Up to the period of which we are now speaking, plants had only 
been described in alphabetical order; about this time, some(rerman 
botanists attempted a collection of individual plants into species ; this 
improvement was received with much approbation. 
* Lord Bacon is generally considered as having first taught the proper method of 
piudying the sciences, viz.: by ascending from facts to principles ; this is called the 
method of inductipn. It has recently been asserted by an able writer in one of our 
first American periodicals, that Bacon was not the author of the inductive 7 hilosophy, 
but that he borrowed his rules of philosophizing from Aristotle, whose real principles 
had for ages been misunderstood. It is to be hoped that men of talents will not so 
far depart from the true rules of philosophizing, as to devote that time in contemling 
about their author, which might be profitably applied in the application of these rules 
to the investigation of truth and nature. 
Botanic gardens first cidrivnted — Botanists began to discover the obstacles to the 
proijress of science — Era of U'ue philosophy --Iiiipi-ovemeii is of German botanists 
