FLORA OF BRITISH FUNGI. 
119 
Agaricus 
(Flammula) clitopilus, Cooke Grev. xiii, 59 
500 
55 
55 
filius, Fr. Ic. Grev. xiii, 45 
432 
55 
55 
ochrochlorus, Fr. Grev. xiv, 37 
616 
55 
o 
o 
2 
glandiformis, C.8fS. Grev. xiii, 59 
490 
55 
55 
arvalis, 8m. Grev. xiii, 59 
479 
55 
55 
latissimus, Cke. Grev. xiii, 60... 
482 
55 
55 
porriginosus, Fr. 
510 
55 
(Tubaria) 
trigonophyllus, Fr. ... 
483 
55 
5> 
pellucidus, Bull 
55 
(Crepidotus) palmatus, Bull , B. 8f Br. Ann. 
Nat. Hist. No. 1855 
55 
55 
epigaeus, P. Grev. x, 152 
516 
55 
(Psalliota) 
augustus, Fr. Grev. xiii, 90 
521 
55 
55 
pratensis, Schceff Grev. xiii, 90 
525 
55 
55 
subgibbosus, Fr. Grev. xiii, 91 
532 
55 
(Pilosace) 
Algeriensis, Fr. 
618 
55 
(Stropharia 
,) coronillus, Bull 
535 
55 
55 
luteo-nitens, Fr. 
604 
55 
55 
spintriger, Fr. W. G. 8. in 
Gard. Chron. 
542 
55 
55 
hypsipus, Fr. Grev xiv, 38 
619 
55 
(Hypholoma) punctulatus, Kalch 
587b 
55 
55 
cedipus, Cke. 
587a 
„ (Psilocybe) sarcocephaliis, Fr. Gard. Chron. 
Oct. 13, 1883 ... 567,620 
,, „ suberic86ns, Fr. Grev. xii, 67 ... 588 
„ „ canofaciens, Cke. ... ... 621 
,, (Psathyra) pellospermus, Bull Grev. xii, 67 577 
„ ,, fatuus, Fr ... ... 595a 
„ „ belobius, Kalch. Grev. xiii, 45... 579 
Hence there are two subgenera omitted, and 39 species of the 
genus Agaricus with coloured spores. The omissions amongst 
the white-spored species are far less numerous, and might be the 
result of accident. 
Of the species included there are two which call for special 
remark — 
Agaricus (Inocybe) echinatus (Roth), Coolce Illust. t. 395. 
This species will be found under page 308, as Agaricus 
(Psaliota) echinatus, Both. 
We decline to express any opinion here as to which is correct, 
but probably it will be conceded that both are not equally accurate. 
Any one desirous of forming an opinion should consult Professor 
Saccardo’s exhaustive treatise “ Interno all’ Agaricus echinatus 
(Roth) ” in the “ Bulletino della Soc. Veneto Trentina di Scienze 
naturali in Padova,” No. 7, for 1879. In this treatise the author 
shows satisfactorily that the proper position for this species is in 
the subgenus Inocybe , and his views are generally accepted on 
the continent. 
