CALIFORNIAN FUNGI. 
87 
Gibbeza ficini, Cke. f Hk. 
Ccespitosa, atro-violacea. Peritheciis stipatis, la3vibus, vix 
papillatis. Stylo-sporis laaceolatis, obtusis, curvulis, triseptatis, 
hyalinis (*03 x '008 mm.). 
On bark of Ficus. (1472.) 
Asci and sporidia not seen. Stylospores evidently different from 
those of G.pulicaris. 
Dothidea sequoiae, Che. & Eh. 
Foliicola, sparsa, convexa, atra, nitida, minuta, unicellulata. 
Ascis late clavatis, sessilibus. Sporidiis biseriatis, lanceolatis, 
obtusis, medio constrictis, uniseptatis, binucleatis, hyalinis (*023 x 
•0075 mm.). 
On leaves of Cupressus. (1182.) 
Dothidea zugodisca, Cke. ^ Ek. 
Hypophylla. Maculis irregularibus, fuscis. Peritheciis angu- 
latis, applanatis, rugosis, congestis. Ascis subclavatis. Spori- 
diis supra rotundatis, infra attenuatis, triseptatis, hyalinis (’016- 
•017 X *004 mm.). 
On leaves of Arbutus Menziesii. (1528.) 
Dothidea cozylina, Cke. Sf Ek. 
Erumpens, orbicularis, depressa, atra, intus concolor. Ascis 
amplis, clavatis. Sporidiis obtuse lanceolatis, medio constrictis, 
1-3 septatis, fuscis (-05 X*015 mm.). 
On twigs of Corylus rostrata. (1381, 1383.) 
Astezina anomala, Cke. ^ Hk. 
EjBfusa, atra, velutina. Peritheciis hemisphericis, vel globoso- 
depressis ; mycelio intricato fusco nidulantibus ; hinc Ilie setis 
rigidis erectis inspersis. Ascis clavatis. Sporidiis biseriatis, lan- 
ceolatis, 1-5 septatis, hyalinis (•02-’022 X '004 mm.). 
On living laurei leaves. (1461.) 
A singular species. Sometimes setse are also found on the peri- 
thecia, which then have somewhat the appearance of a miniature 
Meliola. Perithecia only *08 mm. in diameter, the setae about 
twice as long. 
REVUE MYCOLOGIQUE. 
We have been solicited to draw attention to the continued pub- 
lication of this Journal, and the varied amount of information it 
contains. We are glad to recognise all efforts to diffuse myco- 
logical knowledge and illustrations of mycological subjects. 
Apropos of this we commend to the notice of all connoisseurs in 
iconography the recent illustrations of the Journal in question, 
specially the figure No. 2 of plate X, which is said to represent 
Peronospora viticola. This figure is hardly like the genuine 
American Peronospora with which we are acquainted. It certainly 
must have degenerated since its visit to Europe, if this be a 
genuine portrait. 
