114 OBSERVATIONS ON SOME SPECIES OF NEAPOLITAN FUNGI. 
3. A. Tuberaster. Brig. jun.—( Sc. ined. ; Comes, fung. Nap., 
p. 113, t. xiv., f. 4). Sect. Clitocybe. 
Pileo carnoso, flavescente, centro e depresso infundibuliforme, 
lamellis albis, inaequalibus, subdecurrentibus ; stipite brevi, incurvo, 
crasso, basi rufescente. — Provenit e matrice Polypori Tuberastri. 
We propose, moreover, to modify the said list in regard of the 
following species : — 
1°. Agaricus Cardarella. Fr . — To be considered as a syn. of 
the A. Eryngii , DC. 
2». A. Ferulae. (Lanzi.)— Q. id. id. id. A. Eryngii , 
DC., var. Ferulee. 
3°. A. nebrodensis. Ins. — id. id. id. id. 
4o. A. Aegerita. Fr . — To which the preceding name (A. Aegi- 
rita , Brig.), ought to be substituted. 
5°. A. Brigantii. Fr. — (Syn. A . strobiloides , Brig., jun.), to be 
Considered as a syn. of the A. aegierita, Brig., var. strobiloides. 
6°. Lentinus (Agaricus Brig.) auricolor. Fr. — Id. id. id. 
A. olearius , DC. 
7°. Polyp. Ceratoniae. Risso. _ _ . . . , _ 7 . 
[ Id. id. id. P. sulphureus, Fr. 
8 °. P. Todari. Ins. 
Portici, Gennajo, 1879. 
) 
MYCOGRAPHIA. 
The sixth part of this work, completing the first volume, is just 
issued, with the Title page and three Indices for binding. First, 
there is an Index of the figures in the order of publication. Next, 
a Systematic Index, placing the genera and species illustrated in 
systematic order ; the large genus Peziza , in so far as it has yet 
been illustrated, being divided into subgenera, based on their 
natural affinities. Finally, there is an Alphabetical Index of all 
the species and synonyms which occur throughout the volume. 
This first volume includes such of the Discomycetes as were 
termed by Fries the Pileati , and the commencement of the 
Cupulati with Wynnea and Peziza as far as the end of the section 
Sarcoscypha — that is, nearly all the species of Peziza with large 
sporidia. 
The second volume is proposed to be issued in parts in the same 
manner, and it is anticipated that this will include all the species 
of Peziza which remain to be figured, with perhaps some small 
allied genera, if the former are not too numerous. 
Whether the systematic arrangement will satisfy the inordinate 
craving for new genera, which has of late characterised Mycology, 
is doubtful ; nevertheless, we could not accept the various genera 
already proposed upon the Continent on the basis of carpological 
characters only, in the face of the declaration of one of the 
