37). Schildkrout also interprets work 
roles in “Women’s Work and Chil- 
dren’s Work: Variation among Mos- 
lems in Kano,” in Social Anthropol- 
ogy of Work, edited by S. Wallman 
(New York: Academic Press, 1979, 
pp. 69-85). Although it does not cover 
Hausa women. Women in the Muslim 
World , edited by L. Beck and N. Ked- 
die (Cambridge: Harvard University 
Press, 1978), is useful for comparative 
purposes. 
Shakespeare (p. 54) 
S. Schoenbaum’s article in this issue 
is adapted from his Shakespeare: The 
Globe & the World (New York: Folger 
Shakespeare Library and Oxford Uni- 
versity Press, 1979), published as a 
catalog for a touring exhibition of the 
same name. Illustrated with rare ma- 
terials from the Folger Shakespeare 
Library, the book’s subjects range 
from the fauna and flora of Warwick- 
shire to Shakespeare’s years in Strat- 
ford and London. A. Gurr’s The 
Shakespearean Stage, 1574-1642 
(Cambridge: Cambridge University 
Press, 1970) pictures Shakespearean 
society, drama, acting companies, the- 
aters, and staging. For background on 
the Elizabethan era, see The Horizon 
Book of the Elizabethan World, by 
L.B. Smith (New York: American 
Heritage Publishing Co., 1967), a 
large, colorful book featuring a picture 
portfolio of the Elizabethan theater, 
and A.L. Rowse’s more scholarly 
treatment, The England of Elizabeth 
(New York: Collier Books, 1966), an 
encyclopedic survey of that society’s 
socioeconomic, political, and cultural 
structure. Rowse’s William Shake- 
speare (New York: Harper and Row, 
1963) and S. Schoenbaum’s William 
Shakespeare: A Compact Documen- 
tary Life (New York: Oxford Uni- 
versity Press, 1978) are two carefully 
researched biographies. Because of 
their age, some of the better books 
on Shakespeare and natural history 
are generally not available except to 
those with access to large or university 
libraries. Among these are E.S. 
Rohde’s Shakespeare’s Wild Flowers: 
Fairy Lore, Gardens, Herbs, Gath- 
erers of Simples and Bee Lore (Lon- 
don: The Medici Society, 1935), a “po- 
etical and historical” work that 
analyzes Shakespeare’s references to 
natural history and features color 
plates of beautiful, rare watercolors; 
and The Animal-Lore of Shake- 
speare’s Time (London: K. Paul, 
Trench and Co., 1883), which, accord- 
ing to author E. Phipson, brings to- 
gether “in an accessible form waifs 
and strays of information, collected 
from various sources, relating to me- 
dieval natural history. . . .” The Birds 
of Shakespeare (Chicago: University 
of Chicago Press, 1965) is a reprint 
of J.E. Harting’s The Ornithology of 
Shakespeare Critically Examined, 
Explained, and Illustrated, an 1871 
work that addresses Shakespeare’s 
general knowledge of ornithology and 
natural history. Shakespeare’s Lon- 
don, by H.T. Stephenson (New York: 
Henry Holt and Co., 1905), primarily 
an outline of the city “as it was seen 
by Shakespeare,” describes the cus- 
toms, theaters, taverns, main high- 
ways, the Tower of London, and the 
waterfront. 
Collared Peccaries (p. 60) 
For general, nontechnical informa- 
tion on collared peccaries, see the sec- 
tion on hogs, pigs, and peccaries in 
E.P. Walker’s Mammals of the World, 
vol. 2, pp. 1357-66 (Baltimore: The 
Johns Hopkins University Press, 
1975), and H. Fradrich’s article on 
swines and peccaries in Grzimck's 
Animal Life Encyclopedia, vol. 13, 
pp. 76-108. The Journal of Wildlife 
Management has published a number 
of articles on collared peccaries; 
among the most notable are T.A. Ed- 
dy’s “Foods and Feeding Patterns of 
the Collared Peccary in Southern Ar- 
izona” (vol. 25, pp. 248-57); J.E. El- 
lisor and W.F. Harwell’s “Mobility 
and Home Range of Collared Peccary 
in Southern Texas” (vol. 33, pp. 
425-27); and R.E. Schweinsburg’s 
“Home Range, Movements, and Herd 
Integrity of the Collared Peccary” 
(vol. 35. pp. 455-60). S.W. Herring’s 
“The Role of Canine Morphology in 
the Evolutionary Divergence of Pigs 
and Peccaries” ( Journal of Mammal- 
ogy, vol. 53, pp. 500-512) suggests 
that primitive pigs and peccaries de- 
veloped different population struc- 
tures and that the initial canine modi- 
fication in pigs was a response to social 
selection pressure. H. Fradrich exam- 
ines social behavior in pigs and com- 
pares it with that of peccaries in “A 
Comparison of Behaviour in the Sui- 
dae ,” an article in a two-volume pub- 
lication, The Behaviour of Ungulates 
and its Relation to Management, ed- 
ited by V. Geist and F. Walther (Mor- 
ges: IUCN, 1974). This work also in- 
cludes L.K. Sowl’s “Social Behaviour 
of the Collared Peccary. Dicotyles ta- 
jacu (L.)." Another piece by Sowls 
is “Reproduction in the Collared Pec- 
cary,” a chapter in Comparative Bi- 
ology of Reproduction in Mammals, 
edited by R.W. Rowlands (London: 
Zoological Society of London, 1966). 
While researching techniques of trap- 
ping, tagging, and transplanting the 
collared peccary, B.J. Neal obtained 
“miscellaneous information” on the an- 
imal’s life history, such as its breeding 
habits, protective behavior, and pa- 
rental relations, and established that 
peccaries are faithful to home ranges. 
These observations are presented in 
“A Contribution on the Life History 
of the Collared Peccary in Arizona” 
( American Midland Naturalist, vol. 
61, pp. 177-90). J.A. Bissonette in- 
vestigates how varying temperatures 
affect collared peccaries’ feeding and 
bedding behavior in “The Influence 
of Extremes of Temperature on Ac- 
tivity Patterns of Peccaries” (The 
Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 23, pp. 
339-46). R.M. Wetzel introduced the 
chacoan peccary, which he found in 
a Paraguay thorn forest, in “The Cha- 
coan Peccary, Catagonus wagneri 
( Fusconi j” ( Bulletin of the Carnegie 
Museum of Natural History, vol. 3, 
pp. 1-36). 
Rita Campon 
