15 
1874.”— J. Harbord Lewis. “ I think correct, but the very loose 
flowering panicle is singular.” — C. C. Babington. 
Hubus th/yrsoideus, Wimm. “Near Tardebig, Warwickshire (v. c. 
28) ; July, 1875. A very abundant Bramble in the district. Prof. 
Babington says: “Very near the macroacanthus form of Rev. A. 
Bloxam.’ ” — J. Bagnall. 
Hubus macrophyllus , Weihe, var. c Schlechtendalii. “ Sutton Park, 
Warwickshire (v. c. 28). This has been confirmed by Babington, Sep- 
tember, 1875.” — J. Bagnall. 
Hubus pyramidalis , Bab. “Wood, Llanberis, Carnarvonshire, 
August, 1874.” — J. Harbord Lewis. Specimens from the original 
station, with which those of the pyramidalis of the neighbourhood of 
Plymouth exactly agree. Mr. Bagnall sent an example of a Bramble 
from Bentley Park, Warwickshire, so labelled, but I felt sure it was 
not this, and on submitting it to Babington he pronounced it Guntheri. 
— T. R. A. B. 
Hubus s axatilis, Linn. “Lethonsden, Fife, August, 1875.”- -T. 
Drummond. Nicely in fruit. Not recorded for v. c. 85 in Top. 
Bot.— T. R. A. B. 
Hosa involuta, Sm., var. i. Wilsoni. “Banks of the Menai, N. 
Wales, July, 1875.” — T. B. Flower. Good specimens in flowe r 
from this well-known station, where, however, it is said to be likely 
that it will be soon destroyed. — T. R. A. B. 
Rosa tomentosa , Sm., var. b. subglobosa. “ I know of two localities 
for this, one by roadside near Woolmer Green, on gravel, and another 
on chalk dug out of the tunnels near Welwyn, Herts.” — T. B. Blow. 
“St. Stephens, E. Cornwall, July and September, 1875.” Remarkable 
for the soft texture of its densely hairy leaflets, which have few or no 
glands on either surface. The Cornish plant has shorter peduncles 
than the Welwyn one, in this respect answering the better to Smith’s 
description in his “ English Flora.” — T. R. A. B. 
Hosa tomentosa , Sm., var. /. obovata. “ Egleston, Durham, June, 
1865.” — J. G. Baker. The strongly uncinate prickles are a striking 
feature in this curious variety. 
Hosa micrantha , Sm., var. pedunculo nudo. “Hedge between 
Efford and Egg Buckland village, S. Devon, 1875.” This naked 
peduncled variety of micrantha is put with R. tomentella, Leman, by 
M. Des^glise, an arrangement which I cannot adopt. It differs from 
the type only in having naked peduncles and sepals with few or no 
glands on the back. The var. Briggsii, Baker, is simply a luxuriant 
form of this. The naked peduncled plant has been recently recorded 
