63 
Schultz described this plant as a species (. Archives Flora, 
p. 302-3, 1861) the authority should be enclosed in brackets. 
Schultz’ name, which is supported by a good description, has 
been wisely adopted in lieu of the doubtful S. umbrosa Opiz. 
The varietal name decipiens E. S. Marshall, which was 
proposed (under S. umbrosa) for typical S. neglecta ( Journ . 
Bot. xl. 214, 1902) has been erroneously left standing in the 
London Catalogue and the Plant list. — H. W. Pugsley. 
Stellaria glauca With. Marsh by Walton Bridge, Middlesex, 
July 1, 1928. — E. C. Wallace. 
Arenaria serpyllifolia L. var. viscidula Roth. Durdham 
Down, Bristol, v.c. 34, June 4, 1930 ; and Burnham Sandhills, 
N. Somerset, v.c. 6, June 19, 1930. (2) Var. seabra Fenzl. 
(i.e. the ordinary state in Britain) near Black Rock, Cheddar, 
N. Somerset, July 4, 1930, part of a large plant 16 inches 
across. — H. S. Thompson. Yes ; the Burnham specimens 
appear to match the late C. E. Salmon’s plants from Nagclen 
Marshes, Kent, Sept. 15, 1924. — J. E. Lousley. 
Sagina apetala Ard. Sandy field near Reigate Heath, 
Surrey, August 4, 1930. — E. C. Wallace. Yes. — E. Drabble. 
Yes ; S. apetala Ard., the rarer of the two common British 
forms, var. imberbis Fenzl., with peds. and seps. eglandular, 
foliage nearly glabrous, with fewer and shorter cilia only near 
the leaf-bases. — W. H. Pearsall. I think a lax, eglandular 
form of S. apetala Ard. — H. W. Pugsley. Correct, the common 
form. — J. Fraser. Yes, the glandular-peduncled form. One 
of the two plants on my sheet, with central root, and branches 
spreading all round, looks like f. prostrata (var. prostrata ; S. 
Gibson). I think it cannot be ranked higher than a form. — - 
J. E. Little. Yes, apetala Ard., with eglandular peduncles and 
sepals, and a few long hairs on the leaves. The leaves are not 
sufficiently glabrous to come under var. imberbis Fenzl. 
especially as the few hairs are long, and at the same time they 
are not hairy enough to come under the ciliate-leaved var. 
barbata Fenzl. The specimens I received are intermediate 
between these two varieties. — J. E. Lousley. 
Hypericum . Gravelly field near Perrotts Farm, 
Burgh Heath, Surrey, Aug. 1929 and 1930. I cannot make 
this plant out. It looks like a hybrid. Quite normal H. 
perforatum grew near it. — E. C. Wallace. Is H. Desetangsii 
Lamotte. — A. E. Wade. I think nearest II. Desetangsii. — 
