80 
It may be worth noting that I found last year, near Oxford, 
a second case of a barren, blue-flowered, and apparently 
hybrid plant, growing among a mixed growth of V. Anagallis 
and V. aquatica. — I. A. Williams. (1) [ V. Anagallis L. ?] In 
spite of the rather unusual ‘ set ’ of the inflorescence-branches, 
I think this must be called V. aquatica Bernh. var. Anagalli- 
forrnis (Boreau). (2) I cannot separate this from (1). In both 
sets many of the ovaries are galled, owing to the attack of the 
coleopteran Mecinus beccabungae. — E. Drabble. I think all 
of these specimens belong to V. aquatica Bernh., but the 
material is unsatisfactory, the plants being diseased and most 
of the fruits galled. — H. W. Pugsley. 
Euphrasia nemorosa EAw. Field near Colgate, St. Leonard’s 
Forest, West Sussex, Aug. 17, 1930. — E. C. Wallace. Yes. — 
W. H. Pearsall. Yes. — E. Drabble. Yes, the typical form. — 
H. W. Pugsley. 
Euphrasia nemorosa L hr. [892], Near Lurgashall, W. 
Sussex, Aug. 11, 1930. Gathered rather early in order to 
show the unusualty long basal leaves. — J. E. Little. Yes. 
— W. H. Pearsall. Yes.-— E. Drabble. Yes, typical. — H. W. 
Pugsley. Mr. Fraser says his specimens are var. ciliata 
Drabble. 
Euphrasia nemorosa x Pseudo- Kerneri. Railway bank, Chip- 
stead, Surrey, Aug. 23, 1930. — E. C. Wallace. Det. H. W. 
Pugsley. Evidently correct. Mr. Pugsley has written it 
E. nemorosa var. calcareax Pseudo- Kerneri. The stems and 
branches of E. nemorosa on the chalk arc short and stout. 
Mr. Wallace’s specimens are 9-10 in. long and more slender. 
The flowers are also intermediate in size between the parents. 
— J. Fraser. I should say Pseudo -Kerneri. — E. Drabble. 
I think some of these specimens are E. Pseudo- Kerneri Pugsl., 
but the majority seem to be the hybrid suggested though 
nearer to E. Pseudo- Kerneri . The influence of E. nemorosa 
may be seen in the coarser habit and foliage, the more 
accrescent calyx, and the shorter and broader upper lip of 
the corolla. — H. W. Pugsley. 
Euphrasia curta Fries. Moor, Goathland, N.E. Yorks, v.c. 
62, Sept. 19, 1930. — Ida M. Roper. Yes, f. piccolo Townsend. 
— W. H. Pearsall. Yes ; small curta. — E. Drabble. This 
seems correctly named, although the plants are very poorly 
grown and only the larger individuals show any characteristic 
features. — H. W. Pugsley. 
