104 
variety and very slight hispidity on the styles is sometimes 
seen in micrantha forms, which is the only excuse I can offer 
for the mistake. — A. H. W.-D. 
Correction to the Last Report. 
P. 56, line 9. — For divisa read divulsa. 
Thalictrum dunense auct. angl. = armarium Butcher ? 
Common on the sea-coast sand-dunes at Redcar, N.E. Yorks, 
v.c. 62, August 15, 1931. — J. W. Carr. This is T. minus L. 
sensu stricto ; T. arenarium Butcher. — A. J. Wilmott. 
Thalictrum majus Crantz. By the stream at Wanth waite 
Bridge, Keswick, Cumberland, July 3, 1895. So named for 
me by the late E. F. Linton. Baker, in Flora of Lake District, 
under T. flexuosum calls the Wanth waite Bridge plant T. 
Kochii, on the authority of Babington, but expresses his 
inability to distinguish it from flexuosum. Hodgson, in FI. 
Cumberland, says that a plant gathered by him near Wanth- 
waite Bridge was identified by H. C. Watson as T. saxatile 
DC., but that he himself failed to discover any striking 
differences between it and some of the larger specimens of 
T. flexuosum. — J. W. Carr. 
This is a somewhat frequent plant in the Lake District and 
comes under T. datum Jacquin ( Cambr . Brit. FI. iii, 122) = 
T. umbrosum Butcher ( Furth . Illustr. Brit. PI. 1930, 7). The 
lower leaflets are larger and more obtuse than in majus and 
quite glabrous. The stipules are spreading and fringed, and 
the sepals broadly ovate with few glands. The achenes are 
rather young and in their present condition closely resemble 
those of T. majus. According to Dr. Moss this is not the 
T. datum Jacquin of continental authorities but quite 
distinct and authentic. (See W. B. E. C. 1913-14, 428). 
Babington’s T. flexuosum includes at least two distinct 
forms, and is, moreover, not the T . flexuosum of either Bernardi 
or Reichenbach, so the name is not now used. — W. H. Pearsall. 
This is not T. majus of Crantz and Jacquin. The specimen 
in Herb. Jacquin now in the British Museum herbarium 
