136 
Euphrasia micrantha Reichb., with lilac flowers (Det. H. W. 
Pugsley). Wood at Corwen, Denbighshire, v.c. 50, Aug., 
1931. N. C. R. Miss E. Armitage. Comm. Ida M. Roper. 
Euphrasia Pseudo- Kerneri Pugsl. Banstead Downs, Surrey, 
Sept. 6, 1931.- — E. C. Wallace. Correct. — H. W. Pugsley. 
The plants are small and but little branched, though correctly 
named. — J. Fraser. 
Euphrasia Pseudo- Kerneri Pugsl. Banstead Downs, Surrey, 
Sept. 6, 1931. Not typical as the other gathering and some 
are probably, according to Mr. Pugsley, crossed with E. 
nemorosa. — E. C. Wallace. On looking over these specimens 
I think that most of them are probably pure E. Pseudo- 
Kerneri, but a few with larger and coarser foliage appear to be 
crossed with E. nemorosa. These plants, however, are all 
close to E. Pseudo- Kerneri and much less clearly intermediate 
than some gatherings from the Surrey chalk-hills.- — H. W. 
Pugsley. These specimens are stouter and more branched 
than the other gathering from the same locality, but many 
of the floral bracts are spreading arcuate, and the flowers 
have the magnitude of E. Pseudo -Kerneri, which I should 
call it. — J. Fraser. 
Bartsia Odontites Huds. var. Rush swamp, Mochras, 
Merionethshire, Aug. 20, 1931. — E. C. Wallace. This is 
B. Odontites var. litoralis (Reichb.) (B. simplex Krocker ; 
Odontites litoralis Fries), characterized by its simple or sub- 
simple upright stem, broad calyx-lobes and exserted capsules. 
— E. Drabble. 1 think a small, unbranched form of var. 
verna (Reichb.). Salmon pointed out the peculiarities of 
Reichenbach’s variety litoralis in the Club’s Report for 1929- 
30 (p. 28), and this plant clearly differs in its shorter capsules. 
— H. W. Pugsley. 
Rhinanthus [major Ehrh.J. Sharpham Peat Moor, Somerset, 
June 26, 1931. Growing with or near R. minor Ehrh. (some 
of the plants being difficult to distinguish) at border of ditch 
and rough drove.- — H. S. Thompson. A luxuriant form of 
R. Crista-Galli L. (R. minor Ehrh.). In R. major the bluish 
tooth of the upper lip is much longer than in these specimens, 
and the lower lip is appressed to the upper. This plant has 
been repeatedly collected on the Somerset peat-moors and 
several times mistaken for R. major (vide Report, 1924-25, 
p. 303). I found it at Shapwick in 1898 and tried to persuade 
myself that it was R. major. — H. W. Pugsley. 
