168 
Ranunculus peltatus Schrank, var. floribundus (Bab.). 
Pond at Eastfield, Westbury-on-Trym, W. Glos., May 29, 
1932. — J. W. White. Uncharacteristic for this variety o£ 
peltatus and nearer tlie f. truncatus I should say. — W. H. 
Pearsall. 
Ranunculus Baudotii Godr. Li ttleton- on - Severn , West 
Gloucester, June 18, 1932. — J. W. White. Typical and robust 
Baudotii : some of the floating-leaves are 4-2 cm. across. The 
glabrous fruits are scarcely mature, and therefore appear 
somewhat less prominent than usual. — W. H. Pearsall. 
Corydalis claviculata DC. Oxton Bogs, Nottinghamshire, 
August 13, 1932. Sent because not given for 56, Notts, in 
Druce’s “ Comital Flora.” It is however recorded for Notts, 
in the second Supplement to “ Topographical Botany,” on 
the strength of specimens sent to Arthur Bennett many years 
ago. I have collected it in three widely separated stations in 
the county. — J. W. Carr. 
Fumaria officinalis L. var. Wirtgenii Haussk. [968]. 
White Hill, Hitchin, Hei'ts., July 6, 1932. — J. E. Little. This 
is very well marked material of the variety. — H. W. Pugs ley. 
Nasturtium officinale R. Br. var. microphyllum (Boenn.)? 
Dried up peat ditch, near Shapwick Station, N. Somerset, 
June 25, 1932. Attenuate, small-leaved form up to 3 ft. high. 
Pods, beak and pedicels longer than usual. — H. S. Thompson. 
Yes, a rather large form of var. microphyllum (Boenn.). — 
E. Drabble. I think this is only a weak example of the typical 
species. The plant usually referred to var. ‘microphyllum 
Boenn. has much smaller leaflets, with four pairs to the upper 
leaves. — H. W. Pugsley. 
Barbarea vulgaris R. Br. var. transiens Druce. Tyndall’s 
Park, Bristol, W. Glos., June, 1923. — J. W. White. Yes ; 
I agree . . . — J. Fraser. 
Cochlearia anglica L. Tidal banks of R. Avon, Bristol City, 
W. Glos., May 17, June 11, 1932. With seedling leaves.- — - 
H. S. Thompson. The radical leaves of a seedling are welcome. 
— J. Fraser. This must be placed under C. anglica , sensu 
stricto, though the fruits are narrower than in the plant of 
the Thames marshes, and the lower leaves are more rounded 
at the base than usual. — E. Drabble. Both the pods and the 
