191 
Carex vulpina L. forma interrupted (var. interrupted Peterm.), 
[2681]. Corner of two roads, S. of Whitchurch, N. Somerset. 
July 31, 1932.— H. S. Thompson. 
Carex contigua X vulpina ? [2683]. Growing with both 
species variably at corner of two roads, S. of Whitchurch, 
N. Somerset, July 31 , 1932. It seems to have the more slender, 
less -winged culms of contigua, the perigynia + strongly 
veined as in vulpina, and leaves of an intermediate width. — 
H. S. Thompson. This seems to be weak C. vulpina L. The 
ribbed perigynium agrees with that species, as also does the 
nut, and the narrow foliage may well be due to depauperation. 
— H. W. Pugslev. C’est fini !— Ed. 
Carex vulpina L. [2680]. Corner of two roads, S. of 
Whitchurch, N. Somerset, July 31, 1932. Very variable, 
and growing amidst C. contigua over a large area. Having 
gathered a number of these for further examination it seemed 
a pity to waste them. — H. S. Thompson. 
. Carex Goodenowii Gay, var. juncea Fr. Pool, Strensall 
Common, Yorks, v.c. 64, June 5, 1932. — Ida M. Roper. 
I agree . . . — J. Eraser. This appears to be rightly named, 
but the specimen does not show the ccespitose rootstock that 
characterises the variety. — H. W. Pugsley. The two specimens 
received by me are young, and I am not sure that they are 
identical, but one of them is clearly a form of C. aquatilis 
Wahl, with elongated spikes, whicli is not infrequent in the 
north. — -J. E. Lousley. 
Carex limosa L. Llyn Traffwll, Anglesey. Coll. C. P. 
Hurst, July 15, 1905. Comm. S. Loud. Bot. Inst. 
Carex capillaris L. Teesdale, Durham. Coll. A. 0. Hume, 
June 22, 1903. Comm. S. Lond. Bot. Inst. 
Carex pendula Huds. (Utricles). Parkhurst, Lurgashall, 
W. Sussex, Aug. 17, 1928. — J. E. Little. 
Carex silvatica Huds. (Utrieles). Folly Alder Swamp, 
Hit-chin, Herts., July 4, 1928. — J. E. Little. Mr. Fi ■aser says 
his are C. helodes Link (C . laevigata Sm.) and gives his reasons. 
Mr. Little was not likely to be mistaken, and I suggest that the 
former received by mistake some of Messrs. Ash and Little’s 
New Forest C. helodes utricles under the wrong name. More- 
over I believe helodes is not recorded from Herts. — Ed. 
Carex helodes Link. [984], TJtricles, New Forest, Hants., 
July 29, 1922. Leg. G. M. Ash. Comm. J. E. Little. Correct 
in every way. — J. Fraser. 
