11 
A . s&rpyllifolia L., ?var. [ma^rocarpa Lloyd] . Burn Hill, B lead on, 
N. Somerset, v.c. 6, May 1916.— H. S. Thompson. No; ibis is 
good var. viscidula Roth (gluiin sc Koch), the i per part of the 
plants being densely glandular. — E.S.M. 
A. serpyllifolia L., ? var. Sandy bank by sea, Omeath, C . 
Louth, July 1 9 1 6. — C. H. Waddell. A . leptoclados ^uss. — E. . M 
The common state in Britain— i.e. a. scabra Feme — G.E.S. The 
specimen I kept is the scabrid form of A', serpyllifolia ,-v S.T 
Sagina mciritirm Geo. Don sen. ( see “ Ji. Bot.’ 1917, p. 23). 
Uphill Wharf, N. Somerset, v.c. 6, June 1916. Varying in 
height from 1-6 inches, according to situation. Jordan’s ' ar. or 
form debilis, with prostrate stems radiating from the root, has been 
noted from this coast, and specimens of Mr. Biekham’s from near 
Weston-super-Mare passed both Clubs as debilis. They resemble 
some of this gathering; but I should consider Jordan’s plant 
merely a form, not worthy of varietal rank. — H. S. Thompson. 
This erect form of S. rmritima is not like the “Eng. Bot.” t. 2196, 
and answers better to the description of S. strict a, Fr. —indeed it 
is very like examples from Sussex so named for me, some years 
ago, by Prof. Corbifere. Gren. & Godr. (“FI. Fr.” I. 246, 1848) 
remark that this plant differs from rmritima by the absence of 
petals, and that it has much more the habit of 3. apetala. The 
latter character is well shown in my examples of Mr. Thompson’s 
gathering, but as to the former feature, Smith (E. B. 2195) 
remarks, under rmritima, “Petals minute, often altogether want- 
ing.”— C.E.S. 
S. apetala Ard. On and below a wall, Worlington, W. Suffolk 
v.c. 26, June 12, 1916. Pedicels and sepals glandular; stem 
pubescent, eglandular. — W. C. Barton. This is evidently c. bar- 
bata Fenzl. — C.E.S. 
Scleranthus anmus L., var. biennis (Reuter). Puttenham Heath, 
Surrey, v.c. 17, May 7, 1916. — E. B. Bishop. Yes ; var. hibemvs 
Reich b., “ FI. Exc. Germ.”, p. 568 (T 32) = var. biennis Fries, 
“Ft. Scanica,” p. 118 (1835). Very characteristic of the Lower 
Greensand heaths in S.W. Surrey. The Rev. E. F. Linton has 
suggested that it i. the original form of the species. — E.S.M. 
Vos; a 'Sequent form on our sandy commons. This variety is 
said by Corbi&re (“FI. Norm.”) to equal the var. collinus of 
Brebisson, who, in the later editions of his “FI. Norm.” uses the 
name var. hibemus Reichb. for this plant. I think that var. 
catspMosus Neilr. is probably a condensed state of biennis. — C.E.S. 
