60 
Rogers. St. Mary’s Common, Bournemouth, June 28, 1894. — 
F. A. Rogers. I have seen specimens from about 20 English v.c., 
and found it growing abundantly in Guernsey. It also occurs in 
Co. Down, and at least one or two other Irish counties. A com- 
mon, strong and well-marked bramble between Bournemouth and 
the New Forest, S. Hants., in S. & E. Dorset, and in S. Wilts. — 
W.M.R. 
R. fuscus Wh. & N., var. nutans Rogers. Near Ashley, Milton, 
S. Hants., v.c. 11, Aug. 11, 1917. — Coll. L. Gumming. Comm. 
W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. rosaceus Wh. & N. [?]. Near Llangifni Church, July 1917. — 
J. E. Griffith. Agrees closely with R. melanoxylon Muell. & Wirtz., 
except in cordate base of terminal leaflet and its longish stalk ; 
panicle rachis pale. I can get no nearer than this. The stem 
pieces and the largest panicle belong to one plant, but do the 
other two panicles ? I fear there is mixture again. — H. J.R. 
R. Marshall i Focke & Rogers. (1) Penhoiver Road, near Ban- 
gor, Carnarvonsh., v.c. 49, July 1917. — J. E. Griffith. R. Marshalli 
Focke & Rogers, var. semiglaber Rogers. — H.J.R. (2) Peas 
Pottage, N.E. of Horsham, W. Sussex, v.c. 13, July 30, 1900. — 
J. W. White. 
R. \dumetorum Wh. & N., var. 1 britannicus (Rogers)]. Hedge, 
Tockington Hill, W. Glos., v.c. 34, June 23, 1917. — Ida M. Roper. 
R. Balfourianus Blox. I have it already from Pauntley, v.c. 34. 
— H.J.R. New record for the Gloster division of the Bristol 
district. — I.M.R. 
R. corylifolius Sm., var. sublustris Lees. Wiggonholt Common, 
W. Sussex, v.c. 13, July 4, 1917. — J. W. White. I agree. — 
H.J.R. 
R. (No. 1). Friddcedd Road, Bangor, Carnarvonsh., 
v.c. 49, Aug. 1917. — J. E. Griffith. Two sheets of R. incurvatus 
Bab. (they were separated and made up by me). The other 
three sheets (made up of two stem-pieces and five panicles) are, 
I believe, R. Lindleianus Lees. — H.J.R. 
R. (No. 2). Llanddona, Anglesey, v.c. 52, Oct. 1917. 
— J. E. Griffith. Very late gathered; but though some of the 
characters have disappeared, and there are no notes, I am pretty 
sure that this too is R. pulcherrimus Neum. — H.J.R. 
