101 
R. Eglmteria Hucls., [var. comosa (Rip.)]. Mount Stewart, Co. 
Down, Aug. 191S. — C. H. Waddell. I should rather call it var. 
apricorum Rip., from the roundish fruit. — W.B. This is rather 
R. apricorum Rip., from its globose fruit and spreading, not erect, 
styles, though the strongly aciculate peduncles are those of 
R. comosa. — A.H.W.-D. 
R. rubiginosa L. x spinosissima L. Below Caputh Bridge, East 
Perth, v.c. 89, Sept, 12, 1918.— W. Barclay. 
R. micrantha Sm. Cadbury Camp, Tickenham, N. Somerset, 
v.c. 6, June 25 and Sept. 24, 1918. — Ida M. Roper. I have no 
doubt that this is correctly named. — W.B. Leaflets too small 
tor type. I think it is R. Lemanii Bor., a name I am now using 
to cover the small-leafleted forms which are not conspicuously 
narrowed at the base as in R. hystrix. — A.H.W.-D. 
R. agrestis Savi. Cadbury Camp, Tickenham, N. Somerset, 
v.c. 6, June 25 and Sept. 24, 1918. — Ida M. Roper. I think cor- 
rect. — W.B. This is var. subcuneata Rouy. The type has very 
much narrower leaflets. — A.H.W.-D. 
R. Borreri Woods. Quarry, Damery Bridge, Charfield, W. 
Glos., v.c. 34, July 17, 1918. — Ida M. Roper. Correct, I think; 
apparently grown in shade. — W.B. I agree. A r ery different in 
habit from R. tomentella. — E.S.M. Not R. Borreri , the leaflets and 
peduncle^ are much too glandular. It is a form of R. micrantha , 
very like var. Briggsii Baker, but has glandular-hispid peduncles. 
By Rouy’s key it runs down to his var. protracta, about which I 
know nothing. It may be that glandular-peduncled forms of 
var. Briggsii exist. — A.H.W.-D. 
R. canina L., gr. dumalis Bechst., f. glaucophylla Winch. Filton 
Meads, near Bristol, W. Glos., v.c. 34, June 17 and Sept. 22, 
1919.— Ida M. Roper. This is R. stenocarpa Desegl. R. dumalis 
is larger and stouter, with hispid styles. — A.H. W.-D. A glabrous- 
styled variation of gr. dumalis Bechst., and with glaucous foliage. 
I suppose Winch would have put it to his glaucophylla. — W.B. 
R. dumetorum Thuill., var. urbica (Leman). (1) Court House 
Estate, Horfield, W. Glos., v.c. 34, June 11 and Sept. 19, 1918. 
Ida M. Roper. Correctly named, I think. — W.B. I should 
prefer to label this R. trichoneura Rip., but all the dumetorum group 
are very difficult. — A.H.W.-D. ( 2 ) Filton Meads, near Bristol, 
W. Glos., v.c. 34, June 17 and 22, 1919. — Ida M. Roper. Yes! 
Fruit broadly elliptic, styles nearly glabrous, foliage glaucous. 
W.B. I think nearer R. trichoneura Rip. The old leaflets become 
-subglabrous. — A.H.W.-D. 
