109 
C. Bucknall). — H. C. Littlebury. Yes, the small form of open 
heaths, etc. — C.E.S. 
E. Kerneri Wettst. Hill pasture, at 1600 ft., near Buxton, 
N. Derbyshire, v.c. 57, Aug. 15, 1918. — J. W. White. Yes ; 
rather laxly-grown examples. — C.E.S. 
E. minimi Jacq. (Ref. No. 4445.) Simonsbath, S. Somerset, 
v.c. 5, Sept. 4, 1918. This gathering mainly consisted of rather 
large strong specimens On Exmoor the species varies 
much in size, habit, leaf-outline, and shade of yellow flowers. — 
E.S. Marshall. ( See “ Journ. Bot.” 1919, pp. 169—173.) 
E. Bars by, Leics., v.c 55, July 14, 1916. — A. R. 
Ilorwood. The large inland form of E. borealis Towns., which 
has sometimes been confounded with E. brevipila B. & G. — 
H.W.P. E. borealis Towns. — C.B. 
E. curia Wettst., var. glabrescens Wettst. ( mejudice ). (Ref. No. 
4447). Near Simonsbath, S. Somerset, v.c. 5, at 1000 to 1200 
ft., Aug. 24, 1918. Rather strong examples of the prevailing 
lEyebright in that district, where it reaches 1450 feet or more, 
lit seems to agree well with several gatherings named as above 
I Iby Wettstein, and reminded me of the Scotch forms, when 
I growing. Mr. Bucknall would rather refer it to E. nemorosa ; 
)ut it looks different from the ordinary forms of that. — E. S. 
Marshall. The habit, etc., will not do for this, and it is almost 
00 glabrous for glabrescens. I think it is nemorosa , var. ciliata . — 
: C.E.S. 
Mentha sativa L. ( aquatica x arvensis), var. By Mynde Park 
Lake, Herefordsh., v.c. 36, August, 1918. — Coll. E. Armitage, 
Jomm. S. H. Bickham. The evidence of M. arvensis is not 
>bvious. Is it not a form of M. aquatica 1 — E.S.M. This hirsute 
•oarsely-toothed mint must come, I think, under sativa ( arvensis x 
drsuta) and it may be the form of this, described by Rouy (“FI. 
r r.”) as “pilosa (Spr.) H. Braun,” having leaves large + obtuse, 
trongly toothed, with the teeth acute, straight or concave 
xternally, spreading. — C.E.S. 
M. sativa L., forma. On grass near the stream, Oare, Exmoor, 
Somerset, v.c. 5, Aug. 20, 1919. — F. Long. I do not think 
i his is a form , and should have labelled it simply M. sativa . — 
1 ..B. Yes. M. sativa form. — E.F.L. Here, near Selham, in 
Yest Sussex two mints are common ; both usually referred to 
l. sativa. One is a slender, softly hairy, woodland (glades in 
oodlands) plant, with almost grey flowers. The other is a much 
