212 
large quantity of fine bushes, and very constant. Sudre identifies 
it 'with B. clethrophilus Genev. ; Focke separates the two widely. 
— H.J.R. 
B. Godroni Lee. & Lam. var. roibustus (P. J. M.) [561]. Putney 
Heath, Surrey, v.c. 17, July 10, 1922. — W. C. Barton and H. J. 
Riddelsdell. Yes, 1 think decidedly robustus.— H.J.R. 
B. Golemanni Blox. [534]. Wimbledon Common, Surrey, v.c. 
17, July 10, 1922. — W. C. Barton and H. J. Riddelsdell. Right. 
—H.J.R. 
B. leucostachys Sm. var. macrothyrsus Lange [584]. Portmadoc, 
Carnarvon, v.c. 49, Sept. 6, 1922. — W. C. Barton. Yes ; it occurs 
in great abundance about Portmadoc, both in v.c. 48 & 49. Its 
massed panicles of huge brilliant flowers festooning the lower 
slopes of cliffs, or the banks, make a remarkable sight. — H.J.R. 
B. leucanthemus 1 P. J. M. [570]. Oxshott Common, Surrey, 
v.c. 17. Petals white; stamens equal, outer > styles, seps. 
loosely reflexed, tip rising. July 11, 1922. — W. C. Barton and 
H. J. Riddelsdell. This is the Surrey plant so named (with the 
query) by Rogers ; it is widespread in the county. There is 
doubt as to its identity. Focke (1914) says that Mueller de- 
scribed leucanthemus from a single bush of B. vestitus (the name 
Focke prefers to B. leucostachys) observed near Weissenburg. 
Sudre simply differentiates it from leucostachys by its white flowers 
and less imperfect pollen, and by its being found on calcareous 
(as well as siliceous) soils. If that is so, our plant is not 
leucanthemus Muell. ; it is as distinct from leucostachys as macro- 
thyrsus is. We may have either to place it elsewhere or give it a 
new name. — H.J.R. 
B. lasioclados Focke [562], var. anyustifolius Rogers. Putney 
Heath, Surrey, v.c. 17, July 12, 1922. — - W. C. Barton and H. J. 
Riddelsdell. Yes, under anyustifolius, though the foliage is not 
quite typical. 
B. oigoclados Rogers, var. Newbouldii Rogers [597]. Hedge- 
row near Morfa Buchan Road, Portmadoc, Carnarvon, v.c. 49, 
Sept. 5, 1922. Pets, white, sta. > styles. — W. C. Barton. 
Very good material, with foliage grey beneath. First record for 
N. Wales — for all Wales, indeed, except Glam, and Brecon. — 
H.J.R. 
B. melanodermis Focke [539], Wimbledon Common, Surrey, 
v.c. 17, July 10, 1922. — W. C. Barton and H. J. Riddelsdell. 
This is certainly the correct name, though we at first (1921) took 
the bush for Bloxamii. New for Surrey. — H.J.R. 
