337 
Rosa systyla Bast. [655]. Nr. Parkhurst House, W. Sussex, 
v.c. 13, July 3, 1925.— J. E. Little. Yes, var. systyla, one of our 
most easily recognisable roses, but these are not very characteristic 
specimens.— A. H. W-Dod. 
R. canina L., var. montivaga Comb. nov. [B. 3]. West Town, 
Hay ling Island, Hants, Aug. 1925. This appears to be the above 
by the exserted hairy styles, but the prickles are more like var. 
syntrichostyla Rouy.- — W. Biddiscombe. I think this may pass 
for var. montivaga , but most of the specimens differ from that in 
their longish peduncles and early deciduous sepals. The 
alternative is var. globularis, from which its woolly styles dis- 
tinguish it. Both leaflets and fruit are smaller than is usual in 
var. montivaga , and the leaflets are somewhat more biserrate than 
normal. — A. H. W-Dod. 
R. canina L., var. andegavensis (Bast.) [B. 2]. West Town, 
Hayling Island, Hants, Aug. 1925. — W. Biddiscombe. Correctly 
named, but some of the specimens have their styles almost 
glabrous enough for f. agraria. — A. H. W-Dod. 
R. canina var. Pouzini, f. anglica W-Dod. Fawke Common, 
W. Kent, v.c. 16, July 18, 1925. I send a few sheets of this form 
from its original station, but not from the original bush, which 
exists no longer. It is practically identical with my type speci- 
mens, though in a more advanced stage, showing that the fruit 
is quite ovoid, not subglobose as described. The leaflets also 
are decidedly hairy on the midribs beneath, not rarely so, as I 
wrote in my description. The type of R. Pouzini is glabrous, 
but there are Continental varieties with pubescent leaflets 
showing a connection with R. dumetorum through my Croup 
Aciculatae. — A. H. W-Dod. This plant has been since seen b) r 
Dr. Keller, who agrees with the above determination. 
R. tomentosa Sm., f. eglandulosa W-Dod [B. 1], Horsell Com- 
mon, Woking, Surrey, Aug. 1925. — W. Biddiscombe. Correctly 
named.— A. H. W-Dod. 
R. micrantha Sm. [var. operta Pug.]. White Down, Surrey, 
Aug. 1925. — W. Biddiscombe. This is R. micrantha var. typica. 
The leaflets of one or two small pieces are about as large as those 
of var. operta , but the bulk are much too small, and the fruit is 
that of the type. — A. H. W-Dod. 
Callitriche stagnalis Scop. Bull’s Green, Herts., June 9, 
1925. — J. E. Little and W. R. Sherrin. The numerous forms in 
which stagnalis and platycarpa are recorded by the late Dr. 
