338 
Williams in Prod. FI. Brit., p. 9, 505, 1912, taken from Kiitzing, 
are really only states ! I have traced them on Mitcham Common, 
Surrey, from state to state ; and I agree with Hegelmaier, Mon. 
Gatt. Callitriche (1864), in combining stagnalis and platycarpa. 
The greater difference is in Loennrot’s C. stagnalis var. serpyllifolia, 
which certainly has a facies quite unlike the other forms. 
Williams only referred to Loennrot’s 1854 paper, but he published 
a far fuller one in the Botaniska Notiser of 1867. — A. Bennett. 
Callitriche stagnalis Scop., var. serpyllifolia Loennr. Muddy 
path, Bishop’s Hill Wood, Wickwar, W. Gloster, v.c. 34, June 
30, 1925. This creeping variety, from ground where water has 
long stood, shows smaller and rounder leaves than the plants of 
ditches. — Ida M. Roper. A good representation of Loennrot’s 
variety. — A. Bennett. 
Epilobium hirsutum x parviflorum ( = x intermedium Reichb.). 
Peaty meadow, Clapton Wick, N. Somerset, v.c. 6, July 14, 
1925. A small clump growing with the parents. It resembled 
parviflorum in size and hairiness, with fibrous roots, but the 
dowers were coloured like hirsutum and intermediate in size. 
The serration of the leaves is an important character in Epilobia 
hybrids, and these have neither the hooked teeth of hirsutum nor 
the small callose form of parviflorum. — Ida M. Roper. 
E. roseum Schreb. Ranmore Common, Surrey, v.c. 17, Aug. 
15, 1925. Ref. No. 2819. — C. E. Britton. 
JEthusa Cynapium L., var. agrestis Wall. Near Reculvers, 
E. Kent, v.c. 15, Sept. 11, 1924. — W. R. Sherrin and C. E. 
Salmon. These specimens show well the various points empha- 
sized by Wallroth for his agrestis. — C. E. Salmon. 
Selinum Carvifolia L. Chippenham Fen, Cambs., Aug. 1888. 
— W. J. Cross. Comm. Nat. Mus. of Wales. 
Galium verum L., var. maritimum DC. Minehead, W. Somer- 
set, v.c. 5, sand-hills about Warren Point, Aug. 29, 1925. Crow- 
ing very abundantly associated with Carex arenaria, Psamma, etc. 
Perhaps only an ecological state, even though it has such a dis- 
tinct appearance. — D. C. Catcheside. Yes, the late E. S. 
Marshall considered much of the deshy form of Somerset sand- 
hills little more than an ecological state, though he admitted it 
“ often corresponds to the var. maritimum DC.” — H. S. Thompson. 
Rouy adopts for the dwarf, sand-hill form of this species the 
varietal name littoralis Brebisson. It has been pointed out that 
de Candolle’s description does not match our British plant. — 
H. W. Pugsley. 
