343 
are far more definite than any others that 1 have seen. J- E. 
Little. C. A. Stevens (Steven in French Floras) is not found in 
Biograph. Index of Engl, and Irish Botanists or Suppls. 1 A— 
H.S.T. 
Euphrasia brevipila Burnat et Gremli. f. subeglandulosa. [566.] 
(Det. W. H. Pearsall: doubtful, H. W. Pugsley.) Ippolyts 
Common, Herts., Sept. 1925. — -J. E. Little. 
E. brevipila Burnat et Gremli. Cliff-top, Watermouth Bay, 
near Ilfracombe, N. Devon, Aug. 11, 1924. — D. G. Catcheside. 
I think rightly named, though the characteristic shortly-stalked 
foliar glands are not very obvious. — H. W. Pugsley. E. brevipila , 
with abundance of shortly-stalked glands on two plants and few 
on a thii’d. — W. H. Pearsall. 
E. brevipila [ x nemorosa]. Cliff-top, Watermouth Bay, near 
Ilfracombe, N. Devon, Aug. 11, 1924. Both parents were present 
on the same patch of grass. — D. G. Catcheside. These specimens 
do not seem to me essentially different from those sent from the 
same locality as E. brevipila. — H. W. Pugsley. Updrawn 
E. brevipila. — W. H. Pearsall. 
E. nemorosa Pers. (1) Kingsdown, E. Kent, v.c. 15, Aug. 
1925. — D. G. Catcheside. Probably a form of this, but too badly 
dried for cei'tain determination. — H. W. Pugsley. — I agree with 
H.W.P. — W. H. Pearsall. (2) Bank, Doone Valley, N. Devon, 
Aug. 13, 1924. Growing in great abundance in one spot, where 
I also saw it in September 1925. It is conspicuous by the deep 
purple of the flowers. — D. G. Catcheside. Yes.— H. W. Pugsley. 
Yes.— W. H. Pearsall. 
E. nemorosa Pers., var. ciliata Drabble. Chalky field near 
Woldingham, Surrey, v.c. 17, Sept. 12, 1925. — D. G. Catcheside. 
These specimens, which are fragmentary and gathered late, appear 
to be a slender form of E. Kerneri, although the corollas arc 
not very large. — H. W. Pugsley. E. nemorosa, var. ciliata . — 
Drabble. 
E. occiclentalis Wettst. Hillsborough, N. Devon, v c. 4, Aug. 
10, 1924. — D. G. Catcheside. This plant, which I have seen on 
cliffs at Lynton, Swanage, and elsewhere on the south coast of 
England, seems to be a mai-itime form of E. borealis Towns. 
E. occiclentalis is usually a smaller plant, much more branched, 
and with narrower, more or less glandular foliage. — H. W. 
Pugsley. Not this, but E. borealis. — W. H. Pearsall." 
