377 
Trifolium subterraneum L. St. Catherine’s Bay, Jersey. June 
23, 1926. — J. E. Lousley. 
T. Molinerii Balb. The Lizard, W. Cornwall, June, 1913. — 
C. C. Vigurs. Comm. F. Rilstone. 
T. arvense L., with white flowers. Furze Hill, Hildersham, 
Cambridgeshire, July 8, 1926. This very pretty form was 
growing in large patches. Plants with typically-coloured flowers 
also grew on the hill. — I. A. Williams. 
T. stridum L. The Lizard, W. Cornwall, June 22, 1913. — 
C. C. Vigurs. Comm. F. Rilstone. See Reg. 5 in future. 
Trifolium . Erith, W. Kent, v.c. 16, 1926. St. John 
Marriott. Is Trifolium hybridum L. var. phyllanthum Seringe. 
This monstrous state has greener stipules and calyx-teeth, and 
less developed leaves in the flower-heads than in Miss Roper’s 
specimens from Avonmouth Docks, sent to the Club 1920-21, or 
in a gathering of my own from Bristol, 1917. — H. S. Thompson. 
A monstrous state of T. hybridum L. — H. W. Pugsley. 
Lotus hispidus Desf. Near Christchurch, Hants., July 30, 
1926. These plants were growing at the edge of a piece of land 
which had been levelled for building. It is a considerable dis- 
tance from the place where this species has been known for 
many years. Many of the plants had stems over 30 inches long 
and much branched, some of them measuring over 4 feet across. 
— L. B. Hall. A very remarkable growth. — H.S.T. 
Vida sylvatica L. (1) Thicket near Lydden, E. Kent, v.c. 15. 
June 20, 1925. — J. E. Lousley and John Jacob. (2) Near 
Dover, E. Kent, v.c. 15, July 1926. — J. Jacob. 
V. lutea L. Shingle near Leree, Guernsey, June 15, 1926. — 
J. E. Lousley and M. A. McCrea. 
V. sepium L. var. ochroleuca Bast. Peperharrow, Surrey, 
June 22, 1926. — R. J. Burdon. 
V. angustifolia L. var. Garlaudii Druce. [Ref. x. 13], St. 
Ouen’s Bay, Jersey, June 20, 1926. — J. E. Lousley and T. W. 
Attenborough. The two specimens sent me (no pods) do not 
differ from several gatherings of English and French V. angusti- 
folia L. in my herbarium. Neither the size of the corolla nor 
the size and shape of the calyx is abnormal. If this is typical of 
the “beautiful form of the plant with very large flowers (which) 
is not uncommon,” (Lester Garland, Flora of Jersey, p. 101), 
and of var. Garlandii G. C. Druce in Journ. Bot., 1907, p. 42o' 
