380 
Common, Surrey, Aug. 14, 1926. — E. C. Wallace. R. festivus 
Muell. & Wirtg. ' Supply of stem pieces inadequate. There 
should be two at least to each sheet, taken from mid-stem. One 
or two sheets show only the lower parts of panicles. — H. J. 
Riddelsdell. 
Geum rivale x urbanum. Brickyard Wood, Wallington, W. 
Norfolk, June 12, 1926. — J. E. Little. 
Fragaria moschata Duchesne [Ref. 1020]. Hedgebank on the 
road from Shere Heath to Pitch Hill, Surrey, May 22, 1926. — 
E. C. Wallace. 
Potentilla palustris Scop. Moira, Leicester, June 22, 1926. — 
A. R. Horwood. Comm. Nat. Mus. of Wales. 
Alchemilla pastoralis Buser. Orig. Teesdale, Durham (A. J. 
Wilmott) ; Hort. Reigate, May 20, 1926. An account of this 
plant may be found in Journ. Bot. 1922, p. 164. — C. E. Salmon. 
Poterium Polygamum Waldst. & Kit. var. stcnoloplium (Jorcl.) 
[Ref. x. 56]. Roadside, St. Margaret’s Bay, E. Kent, v.c. 15, 
June 25, 1925. — J. E. Lousley. 
Rosa arvensis Huds. var. White Down, Surrey, July 1926. — 
W. Biddiscombe. The collector does not say why he labels this 
“var.” All roses vary so much that it would be justifiable to 
add “var.” after the names of the majority. Here the clustered 
peduncles seem to indicate f. major , but these often occur in the 
type, while f. major usually has a much more ovoid fruit, but I 
see no great objection to the name. The most striking feature 
is the trespassing of the glandular setae on the peduncles to the 
base of the fruit in many cases, but I know of no name to cover 
such a form. This does not occur on all the sheets, showing the 
care that must be taken by the collector to send in a homoge- 
neous series. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. 
R. stjlosa Desv. var. Near Compton, Surrey, Sept. 18, 1926. — 
W. Biddiscombe. This is fairly typical var. systyla, though some 
of the leaflets have become nearly glabrous from age. I have 
marked four pieces which belong to three different varieties in 
other species, and which should not be distributed. — A. H. 
Wolley-Dod. 
R. stylosa near chlorantha. Dolley’s Farm, Horscll, Woking, 
Surrey, Sept. 4, 1926.— W. Biddiscombe. This is not chlorantha, 
nor any variety of R. stylosa. The disc is too flat and the 
prickles too slender and straightish. It is one of the small- 
