465 
Some Corrections to the Last Report. 
P. 423, line 22. — For Jarhb. read Jahrb. 
P. 428, line 9. — For radicle read radical. 
P. 434, line 3.— For patch read plant. 
P. 442, last line but six. — For neutrally read ventrally. 
P. 450, line 16.— After “ first seen ” add in a pasture at 
Hillsley, Glos. 
Balance Sheet, last line.— For December 31st, 1927 read 
December 31st, 1926. 
H. Stuart Thompson, 
April, 1929. Hon. Sec. 
Thalictrum dunense Dum. [Z 26]. Knocke-sur-mer 
Belgium, July 13, 1928. — J. E. Lousley. Correct. — A. 
Bennett. This seems exactly T. minus var. maritimum 
Syme, which is the plant primarily intended by Linnaeus 
as T. minus. The original specimens of T. dunense Dumort. 
are large and not exactly identical with the commonest 
form found on our British dunes. It is therefore preferable 
to use Syme’s name until the whole of our forms have been 
correlated with Continental material. — A. J. Wilmott. 
Ranunculus Drouetii F. Schultz. [Z 32]. Muddy ditch 
near Bognor, West Sussex, June 1928. — J. E. Lousley. Yes, 
J. Groves. May be this, but my material is quite inadequate 
for stable determination. — W. H. Pearsall. 
Ranunculus [sphaerospermus Hiern. Z 39]. Near West 
Barnes Level Crossing, Raynes Park, Surrey, June 23, 1928. 
Finding a plant so named in a friend’s herbarium, I went to 
the spot to look for it myself. The hairy carpels and largish 
flowers certainly point to this species, but the determination 
seems doubtful, so I send it for opinions. The small quantity, 
and bad quality of this plant prevented my taking more 
material. — J. E. Lousley. I should say R. Drouetii. R. 
sphaerospermus as I understand it has larger flowers and long 
peduncles. — J. Groves. Not this but R. heterophyllus var. 
submersus Bab. — W. H. Pearsall. 
Ranunculus Burgh Common, Fleggburgh, Norfolk, 
July 9, 1928. — R. J. Burdon. R. peltakis, Schrank. It seems a 
pity this pretty form was not " floated out ” so as to show to 
advantage. Batrachian Ranunculi will repay such treatment, 
