473 
panicle and obovate leaflets it should be marked fuscus Whe. 
and N. /. — H. J. Riddelsdell. 
Rubus . [Ref. 46]. Wood near Chipstead, Surrey, 
July, 12, 1928. Petals whitish pink. Sepals erect in flower, 
becoming reflexed. White stamens longer than the reddish 
styles. — E. C. Wallace. R. infecundus Rog. which Sudre 
(wrongly I believe) identifies with R. rufescens Lefr. and 
Muell. Both description and figure as given in Sudre show 
that the two are not identical, though examination of speci- 
mens show a close affinity.- — H. J. Riddelsdell. 
Rubus . [Ref. 32]. Banstead Downs, Surrey, July 7, 
1927. — E. C. Wallace. This is part of what has hitherto 
been referred to R. argenteus f. glandidosa. It has also, I 
believe, been named Gelertii. But it is neither. It is a 
widespread form which I hope to describe and name, for I 
cannot find anything to which it corresponds. The rachis 
and clothing (or want of it !) is a remarkable feature, and 
brings it near Rogers' podophyllus, but it is not that. — H. J. 
Riddelsdell. 
Alchemilla Salmoniana Jaquet. Origin Cumberland, 1925. 
Hort. Reigate, May 1927 and 1928. See Journ.Bot., 1926,280. 
— C. E. Salmon. The outstanding features of this new species 
seems to me to be the general villosity of the stems as in 
A . pratensis but glabrous towards the top ; the general pilosity 
of the leaves of that species, but more copiously hairy towards 
the periphery of the leaf beneath ; the glabrous urceoles and 
sepals, except that the latter are more or less ciliate round 
the apex, recalling the true leaves and bracts of which they are 
a homologue. — J. Fraser. 
Rosa hibernica Tempi. No. 2074. Lorton, Cumberland, July 
29, 1928. — A. H. Wolley-Dod. I sought for this rose this year 
hoping that I might find a clue to its precise parentage, 
but am unable to do so, though in all probability it is one of 
the varieties of R. dumetorum Thuill. I saw no form of 
R. coriifolia in the neighbourhood, but that is no bar to that 
being a possible parent, in fact the shortness of the peduncles 
on some of the specimens are in favour of it. — A. H. Wolley- 
Dod. 
Rosa . [Ref. Z 33]. Hedgebank by Pebblecombe, 
Surrey, Sept. 2, 1928. — J. E. Lousley. This agrees very 
well with R. canina var. spuria (Pug.). I should until recently 
