NKWS OK OTIIKK SOCIETJKS. 
(35 
iii-cluieological society should he quite distinct from the natural history 
one, or the ijublication of family ajid parish records will quickly swamp 
natural history work and papers, a disastrous result only too manifest 
in the journals of some of the combined* archaeological and natural 
history societies.” This is true enough. There is at least one county 
in which archaeological papers arc; published as readily in the Proceed- 
ings of the “ Naturalists’ Field Club ” as in the Transactions of the 
“ Archaeological Society.” 
We understand that a substantial supplement, embodying additions 
and corrections received since going to press, will be issued later this 
year. 
