distiubtttok’s report for 1950 
125 
Limoniwm hinervosum (G. E. Sm.) G. E. Salmon. 70, Cumberland ; 
sandstone cliffs, Fleswick Bay, St. Bees Head, 28th July 1950. — Miss C. 
W. Muirhrad, comm. Caexisle Mtjsextm (Ref. No. 50.143). 
Euphrasia nemorosa (Pers.) Lbhr var. calcarea Pugsl. 28, West Nor- 
folk; railway embankment on chalk, by road from Narborough to Mar- 
ham, 22nd July 1950. — E. L. Sw'ann (Ref. No. 2131). “ E. nemorosa 
(Pel’s.) H. Mart, emend. Lohr, but not, I believe, the plant to w'hicli 
Pugsley’s description of var. calcarea best applies. The plant distri- 
buted is a common form on chalk and limestone and has sometimes been 
called var. calcarea Pugsl. and sometimes var. collina Pugsl., but T 
doubt whether either name is reallj' applicable to it. I cannot give it a 
varietal name at present.” — E. F. Warburg. 
Euphrasia scotica Wettst. (“ E. micrantha Rchb.”). 70, Cumber- 
land; gill near the Watendlath track, above Rosthivaite, Borrowdale, 
22nd July 1950. — Miss C. W. Muirhead (Ref. No. 50.138 B). Det. E. 
F. Warburg. 
Euphrasia, montana Jord. 70, Cumberland; meadow below Watend- 
lath Tarn, Borrowdale, 22nd July 1950. — Miss C. W. Muirhead, comm. 
Caruislb Museum (Ref. No. 50.135). “ Correct. — E. F. Warbxtrg. 
Mentha longifolia (L.) Huds. var. horriduln Briquet. 28, W'^est Nor- 
folk; semi-heathland on greensand, by Leziate golf course, 1st August 
19-50. — E. L. Swann (Ref. No. 2132). 
Mentha piperita L. var. officinalis Sole lusus pilosus Still. 28, West 
Norfolk; hedgerow by dykeside. Marsh Lane, Dersingham, 31st August 
1950. Confirmed by R. Graham.— E. L. Swann (Ref. No. 2165). 
Mentha piperita L. var. siobcordata Fraser. 28, West Norfolk; dyke 
on Roydon Common behind Grimston Road station, 29th August 1950. 
Det. R. Graham. — E. L. Swann (Ref. No. 2144). 
Mentha piperita L. var. vulgaris Sole. 28, West Norfolk; dykeside, 
Roydon Common, east of the level crossing, 29th August 1950. Con- 
firmed by R. Graham. — E. L. Swann (Ref. No. 2166). 
Euphorbia virgata W. & K. 17, Surrey; railway embankment, San- 
derstead, 28th May 1950 (Ref. No. 3468) and 25th June 1950 (Ref. No. 
3642). — D. P. Young. “ This is certainly Euphorbia virgata auct. 
angl. There seems something to be said for Croizat’s view that the 
plant commonly called virgata does not square well with the original 
picture of E. virgata in Waldstein and Kitaibel’s Eesc. Ic. El. Bar. 
ITung., 2, 176, t. 162 (1805). Those who accept Croizat’s conclusions 
mixstcall our plant E. Podperae Croiz. (E. intercedens Podp., non Pax) : 
see his paper in 1945, Amer. Midi. Nat., 33, 231-243, and 1947 op cit 
37, 801-2.”— J. P. M. Brenan. 
