108 
msTmTH'Toii’s t?ri’ort for 1052 
Tjigusfnini oralifolium Hassk. 1, W. C'Onnvall : Lamboiirne Hill, 
Perranzabuloe, July 17th 1952. S(m> Wafsaiiia, 2, 28G-287 (1952). — F. 
Rirstone, conf. E. F. WARRUi'.Ci. 
Sumpliyftnn urieniale T;. IG, W. Koiit; roadsido vorgo, adjoiniug a 
shrubbery but actual origin not known, Tglitham (Grid Rc'f. 51 /58G8), 
May 18th 1952 (Ref. No. 436G). — D. P. Young. “Correct.” — A. E. 
AV.vde. 
Siimphyfu'm peregrirnim Ledob. 14, E. Sussex; amongst ruins of 
cottages, Bishopstone, May (list 1952 (Ref. No. IGGO).— 1). P. Young. 
“Correct.” — A. E. Wade. 
Solnnvm psevdo-cnpaintm T;. 21, Middlesex; extending for about 4 
yards under the wall of St. Bernard’s Hospital, canal bank, near Wind- 
mill Bridge, Hanwell, August 18th 1945 (Ref. No. 450818.‘1). When found 
by Mrs. J. M. B. King in 1945 this plant was already well established 
and may have been there for several years. It still persists. The 
material is not typical of S. p.-iPudo-ciipsirvw but this may possibly 
be due to the effect of growing out of doors in our English climate. — 
J. E. TjOUSUey. 
(Euphraaia nemorom (Pers.) H. Mart, emend. Lohr.) 1, W. Corn- 
wall; waste heath ground by Perraiizabuloe cburch, August 21st 1952. 
Corolla lip white. — F. Riestone. “This gathering does not appear to 
me to be homogeneous. Some plants without a main stem, with alternate 
bracts, and an emarginate capside appear to be E. ronfasa Pugsl.. 
others, with a main stem, stiffly erect habit, opposite bracts and the 
capsule less emarginate, E. ’neiitnrnftn , and others hybrids between Ibe 
two species.” — E. F. Waurur,g. 
Euphrasia nemorosa (Pers.) H. Mart, emeiid. Lohr var. transiens 
Pugsl. 1, W. Cornwall; Caridvief, Perraiizabuloe, August 20th 1952. 
Corolla lip purple. A widespread plant in Perraiizabuloe, always on 
damp or wet peatj’ ground. In a wet season it is much more robust 
with larger bracts. T first distributed it through the Botanical Ex- 
change Club in 1918 as eglandular E. Jirevipila, when Pearsall and 
TiUmb inclined to agi'ee but Bucknall, Wheldoii, Pugsley, Barton, and 
Drabble thought it was E. herncri. In 1925 I distributed it through the 
Watson Botanical Exchange Club as E. Kerneri, when Pearsall accepted 
the name but Pugsley said, “E. nemorosa, the foliage of the smaller 
specimens resembling that of E. conjusa." — F. Riestone. “Yes, un- 
doubtedly E. nemorosa (Pers.) H. Mart, emend. Lohr. It may, perhaps, 
as Mr. Riltone suggests, be put under var. transiens Eiigsld' — E. F. 
Warburg. 
’Rhinanthus spndicens Wilniott. 92, Aberdeen ; among heather, 
liochnagar, July 21st 1952. — IT. K. Dunc.an. “Yes, good characteristic 
material. The flower colour should, however, be noted on the labels.” — 
E. F. Warburg. 
