1910-11.] The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal. 55 
Table XIV. — Comparison of the Length of the Frontal Arc. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. An adult male chimpanzee 
92 
2. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
100 
110 
120 
3. Four Kalmucks ..... 
110 
115-2 
120 
4. Three Spy-Neanderthal 
115 
124 
133 
5. Five Europeans, unsexed 
121 
125-6 
130 
6. Forty-seven Tasmanians, unsexed . 
113 
126 
143 
7. Gibraltar 
126 
8. Briix 
135 
9. Cannstatt 
135 
10. Galley Hill 
135 
11. Briinn 
135 
12. Cro-Magnon ...... 
138 
Dschagga negroes and Veddahs absent. 
Table XV. — Comparison of the Length of the Chord of the Os Frontale. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. An adult male chimpanzee 
87 
2. Four Kalmucks ..... 
98 
103-8 
107-5 
3. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
96 
104 
112 
4. Fifty Tasmanians, unsexed 
97 
109-5 
120 
5. Gibraltar ...... 
111 
6. Five Europeans, unsexed 
109 
112-5 
118-5 
7. Three Spy-Neanderthal 
108 
114 
119 
8. Briix 
114 
9. Cannstatt 
117 
10. Galley Hill 
120 
11. Briinn 
123 
12. Cro-Magnon 
123 
Dscbagga negroes and Yeddahs absent. 
Table XYI. — Comparison of the Curvature Index of the Os Frontale. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Pithecanthropus erectus 
93-3 
94-6 
96 
2. An adult male chimpanzee 
94-5 
3. Three Spy-Neanderthal .... 
89-4 
92-8 
939 
4. Briinn ....... 
91-1 
5. Four Kalmucks ..... 
88-3 
90 T 
92-8 
6. Five Europeans, unsexed 
87-4 
89-5 
91-1 
7. Cro-Magnon ...... 
89-1 
8. Galley Hill 
88-8 
9. Gibraltar ...... 
88 
. . . • 
10. Forty-seven Tasmanians, unsexed . 
81-4 
87-1 
97'5 
11. Canstatt 
86-6 
V | 
12. Briix 
84-4 
[ 
Dschagga negroes and Veddahs absent. 
