1910-11.] The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal. 59 
Table XXV. — Comparison of the Parietal Frontal Arc Index. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Briix ....... 
80 
2. An adult female chimpanzee . 
82-6 
3. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
71T 
85*8 
102-7 
4. Gibraltar 
88 
5. Cannstatt ...... 
. . . 
96-2 
6. Three Spy- Neanderthal .... 
89-4 
96-8 
104-3 
7. Galley Hill 
97*7 
8. Cro-Magnon 
97-8 
9. Forty-five Tasmanians, unsex ed 
85-8 
99*7 
114-1 
10. Briinn ....... 
103-3 
11. One European ..... 
109-9 
Dschagga negroes, Veddahs, and Kalmucks absent. 
Table XXVI. — Comparison of the Lambda Angle. 
Minimum. 
i 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Nearest Anthropoids .... 
43 
55-5 
68 
2. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
66 
3. Neanderthal 
66-5 
67 
Spy l 
67 
68 
4. Gibraltar 
69 
5. Cro-Magnon ...... 
70 
6. Galley Hill 
74 
7. Briinn 
78 
8. Briix ....... 
90 
9. Forty-six Tasmanians, unsexed 
74 
80-5 
88 
10. Modern Man 
78 
81-5 
85 
11. Cannstatt ...... 
83 
Dschagga negroes, Veddahs, and Kalmucks absent. 
Table XXVII. — Comparison of the Opisthionic Angle. 
1 
Minimum. 
I 
j Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
64 
2. Nearest anthropoids .... 
50 
59'5 
69 
3. Spy 1 
54 
Neanderthal ...... 
515 
4. Galley Hill 
42 
5. Briinn 
42 
6. Thirty-eight Tasmanians, unsexed . 
34-5 
40-6 
47 
7. Gibraltar 
36 
8. Recent Man 
SI 
35-5 
40 
9. Cro-Magnon 
34 
J 
Briix, Cannstatt, Dschagga negroes, Veddahs, and Kalmucks absent. 
