1910-11.] Bone Growth in absence of Functioning Testicles. 113 
The proportions which the lengths of the bones bear to the stature of 
subject A 9 and to each other are of interest. They are given in Tables 
XVII., XVIII., XIX., and XX. 
Table XVII. — Length of Humerus as compared with the Stature. 
Stature = 100. 
(Average Index as given by Topinard (15) . . 19 - 8.) 
Length of Right 
Humerus. 
Humerus- Stature 
Index. 
mm. 
Subject A 9 
335 
19-3 
Magrath (8) 
431 
19 7 
Byrne (8) 
450 
19 
From Table XVII. it is evident that, in relation to stature, the humerus 
of A 9 is short, and that in this respect it resembles the humeri of the 
giants. 
Table XVIII. — Length of Radius as compared with the Stature. 
Stature = 100. 
(Average Index as given by Topinard (15) . . 14‘4). 
Length of Bight 
Radius. 
Radius-Stature 
Index. 
mm. 
Subject A 9 
259 
14-95 
Magrath (8) 
331 
15-2 
Byrne (8) ... 
334 
14-5 
From Table XVIII. it is evident that, in relation to stature, the radius 
of A 9 is longer than normal, and that in this respect it resembles the radii 
of the giants. 
Table XIX. — Radio-Humeral Index. 
Length of Humerus = 100. 
(Average Index as given by Topinard (15) . . 73*4.) 
Length of Right 
Humerus. 
Length of Right 
Radius. 
Index. 
Subject A 9 . 
mm. 
335 
259 
77-3 
Magrath (8) . 
431 
331 
76-8 
Byrne (8) 
450 
334 
74-2 
From Table XIX. it is evident that the radius of A 9 is disproportion- 
ately long, and that in this respect it resembles the radii of the giants. 
VOL. xxxi. 8 
