16 
BULLETIN 923, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 
gross feed cost of producing it than during the first winter. This 
was due to a higher price paid for milk during the second winter. 
i 
1 
• 1 
_i 
S. 1 
"1 
4 
1 
_S o 
hi 
5! 
4 
1 
It 
i 
P 
Q 
1 
1 
L 
"1 
P 
I 
5 
1 
1 
hi 
i 
L 
T s 
1 
1 
1 
1 | 
1 L-,1 
1 
1 
Ik ' 
1! 
5 
1 1 
fc 
£- -* 
5 
£ 1 
1 
5 h 
£ 3 1 - 
1 l 
*- -SI 
| 
^5 £ 
1 g 
ft 
& 
k 
* 
k 
i 45 
1 
Lj 
1 
-S 
! 
w=. 
i 
3 Id II 
\ 5 
F < 
5 e 
F 7 
lj 
! 
! 1 
f o 
5 « 
r 
) i 
? v 
3 c 
3 1 
] ■ 
3 r 
11 
1 * 
5 
55 
» 
> a o 
5 cyj a 
« 
5 
• 
aj aj cy f v 
§ § 8 § 5 
>{ >! V ^ > 
O O Q 
) * § OJ 
>: n s: 
il 
§1 
■M 
r 
i 
§ I 
SOA//70& OO/ eWfa' JLSV3 M?A/ 
It will be noted that the gross winter feed and bedding cost was 
71.9 per cent and 72.4 per cent, respectively, of the first and second 
year's gross feed, pasture, and bedding cost, while the per cent of the 
