CARRYING QUALITIES OF EXPORT CORN. 28 
natural ‘‘Central”’ 
corn surrounding it 
became badly dam- 
aged. Also, in hold 
4 the dried ‘‘A’’ corn, 
which at time of load- 
ing was lower by 1.4 
per cent in moisture 
and by 5c. c. in acid- 
ity than the dried 
“‘B”’ corn, remained 
sound, while the dried 
‘‘B”’ corn in the same 
relative position of 
stowage as the dried 
‘“A”? corn became 
Bagierd Fig. 14.—Mlustrating the results of “sweat” on the top portion of the 
adly amaged. corn under the hatch in hold 3. (Cargo No. 1.) 
| GARGO No.1 
ACIDITY -C.C. 
CORRELATION OF THE 
CHANGES IN TEMPERA- 
Ss, 
Q TURE AND THE CHANGES 
= IN ACIDITY, GERMINA- 
x TION, MOISTURE CON- 
t TENT, AND TEST WEIGHT 
3 PER BUSHEL. 
3 The comparison of 
” the average condi- 
: tion of the natural 
. “Central,” natural 
Q “Southwestern,” 
5 7 dried ‘‘A”’ and dried 
t | SOUND KERNELS~% | “B” corn in each 
> sora Se Bat NaN ae Ta OER hold; also the com- 
« parison of the aver- 
ny ages for the total 
< ; corn of each lot at 
KR WEIGHT PER BUSHEL2Lbs| the time of loading 
3 £5 5 with the averages at 
7 time of discharge in 
B Denmark are shown 
in Table 6. The ay- 
erage condition of 
WE = CONDITION OF THE CORNAS DIScHARGED the corn in each lot 
in the top third, 
Fig. 15.—Correlation of the temperature and condition of the corn as ; = 
loaded and as discharged. (Cargo No. 1.) middle third ? and 
