FAMILY LIVING FROM THE FAEM 
11 
Table 3. — Variations in the value of the family living from the farm — Contd. 
as 
3 S 
o 
Eh 
Value of family liv 
ing from the farm groups 
Year and locality 
8 
o 
09 
o 
o 
2 
Jo 
09 
O 
O 
O 
4^ 
s 
o 
s 
SO 
«9 
OS 
€^ 
o 
o 
o 
© 
1921 
Vermont, Orange and Windsor Counties 
211 
84 
100 
60 
237 
229 
61 
62 
150 
181 
250 
150 
175 
152 
No. 
farms 

..... 
No. 
farms 
..... 
5 
3 
3 
5 
2 
19 
4 
8 
9 
30 
19 
2 
No. 
farms 
77 
13 
38 
30 
36 
50 
24 
25 
54 
56 
80 
84 
86 
28 
No. 
farms 
101 
27 
37 
21 
88 
109 
24 
14 
44 
61 
108 
31 
51 
C4 
No. 
farms 
28 
25 
14 
4 
57 
41 
9 
2 
34 
35 
38 
5 
15 
33 
No. 
farms 
5 
9 
4 
27 
17 
2 
1 
10 
6 
13 
No. 
farms 
9 
2 
Ohio, Washington County.. ...... 
1 
Iowa: 
26 
Warren Countv ....... ... 
7 
Montana, Sheridan and Daniels Counties 
1 
4 
14 
Idaho and Washington, Palouse country 
Washington: 
King and Pierce Counties... ... 
2 
Yakima Hminty 
3 
19 
1 
6 
Total. 
2,102 
2 
110 
681 
780 
340 
116 
73 
1922 
Delaware, Sussex County . ... . 
86 
100 
100 
64 
202 
74 
66 
57 
82 
61 
66 
159 
87 
139 
152 
2 
39 
49 
20 
38 
58 
11 
31 
21 
18 
27 
25 
38 
26 
51 
52 
38 
32 
13 
15 
86 
24 
22 
13 
25 
13 
19 
65 
39 
61 
44 
6 
9 
4 
4 
33 
19 
6 
9 
15 
3 
6 
34 
14 
15 
39 
1 
5 
3 
13 
10 
4 
7 
1 
1 
9 
5 
o 
9 
Florida: 
1 . 
38 17 
" | 6 
i 5 
Polk County 
5 
1 
Iowa: 
7 
10 
South Dakota, Jones County 
6 
6 
3 
17 
15 
5 
1 
10 
5 
1 
Kansas: 
4 
Thoma.s and Sherman Counties 
14 
Montana: 
Dawson and Custer Counties. .. . 
Colorado, Washington and Lincoln Counties. 
Idaho, Twin Falls County. .. . 
8 
2 
Washington, Yakima County . . 
Oregon, Sherman County 
3 
Total 
1,495 
38 
103 
504 
509 
216 
70 
55 
Grand total. 
7,738 
105 
345 
2,099 
2. 855 
1,492 
517 
325 
YEARS OF PROSPERITY AND DEPRESSION 
The relation of the family living from the farm to the farm receipts, 
the farm income, the family income, and the labor income, either in 
lean years in a locality^ or in years of general depression, stands out 
in bold contrast to their relation in years of prosperity. (See Table 
4.) The family living from the farm may well be looked upon as a 
form of insurance, and it is wisdom on the part of farmers to produce 
food supplies for the farm family to the greatest practicable extent. 
