RENTING TRUCK FARMS IK NEW JERSEY. 
19 
Table XIV. — Variation in the size of the labor income of tenants on 246 New Jersey truck 
farms. 
Total 
number. 
Number in each tenure group. 
Labor income of tenant. 
Half of crops. 
Half of 
crops and 
of milk. 
Share 
. other 
than half. 
Cash rent. 
Early 
truck. 
Late 
truck. 
Late 
truck. 
Either 
early or 
late 
truck. 
Early 
truck. 
Late 
truck. 
Over $1,500 
13 
15 
56 
90 
56 
16 
6 
3 
19 
29 
23 
10 
3 
8 
26 
38 
18 
3 
2 
2 
2 
4 
2 
1 
1 
4 
6 
8 
2 
1 
$1,000 to $1,500 
1 
3 
8 
1 
$500 to $1,000 
2 
$0 to $500 
Minus $500 to $0 
4 
1 
246 
90 
96 
12 
13 
22 
13 
The income available to the family of the tenant is also of significance 
for purposes of comparison. If we add to the labor income of the 
tenant the value of unpaid family labor and 6 per cent on his invest- 
ment in working capital, both of which are deducted from the receipts 
of the tenant in obtaining his labor income, we have the amount 
available to the tenant and his family for living expenses and from 
which to save, assuming that the tenant does not have any interest 
to pay on borrowed capital. The average family income of 246 
tenants was $633. Table XV shows the variation in the size of the 
family income. 
Table XV. — Variation in the size of the family incomes of the families of 246 tenants on 
New Jersey truck farms. 
Total 
number. 
Number of farms in 
each tenure group. 
Tenant's family income. 
Half of crops. 
Half of 
crops and 
of milk. 
Share 
other 
than half. 
Cash rent. 
Early 
truck. 
Late 
truck. 
Late 
truck. 
Either 
early or 
late 
truck. 
Early 
truck. 
Late 
truck. 
Over $1,500 
25 
28 
78 
83 
32 
8 
10 
28 
27 
17 
9 
13 
35 
33 
6 
4 
2 
2 
5 
8 
5 
2 
$1,000 to $1,500 
2 
3 
7 
1 
1 
$500 to $1,000 
4 
4 
3 
$0 to $.500 
4 
3 
246 
90 
96 
12 
13 
22 
13 
Thirteen per cent of the 246 tenants failed to make any family 
income. In other words, when allowances are made for all expenses 
and for the maintenance of the working capital, these tenants, their 
families, and their capital were employed a year without reward. 
Sixty-five per cent of the 246 tenants made a family income of between 
