40 BULLETIJT 1119, U. S. DEPARTMENT OE AGRICULTURE. 
Figures 13 and 14 supplement Tables 4 and 6 by showing graphi- 
cally the computed 1920 lumber production, by States and b}^ species, 
respectively. 
The several woods which go to make up the bulk of the lumber 
cut in the United States are treated individually in the following 
BILLIONS OF BOARD FEET 
WASHINGTON 
OREGON 
LOUISIANA 
MISSISSIPPI 
CALIFORNIA and NEVADA 
ARKANSAS 
ALABAMA 
TEXAS 
NORTH CAROLINA 
WISCONSIN 
VI RGI NIA 
FLORI DA 
I DAHO 
TENNESSEE: 
GEORGIA 
MICHIGAN 
WEST VIRGINIA 
SOUTH CAROLI NA 
MINN ESOTA 
PENNSYLVANIA 
MAINE 
KENTUCKY 
NEW YORK 
MON TANA 
M IS50URI 
INDIANA 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 
OHIO 
VERMONT 
OKLAHOMA 
MASSACHUSETTS 
ARIZONA 
NEW MEXICO 
MAR YLAN D 
CONNECTI CUT 
COLORADO 
ILLINOIS 
SOUTH DAKOTA 
NEW JERSEY 
DELAWARE 
IOWA 
RHODE ISLAND 
UTAH 
WYOM I NO 
KANSAS AND NEBRASKA 
COMPUTED TOTAL LUMBER PRODUCTION IN 1920 BY STATES 
Fig. 13.— The three Pacific Coast States now stand among the first five in point of production. 
pages. The tabulation for each species shows by States the number 
of active mills reporting, the quantity reported cut, the proportion 
of the total reported cut, the average value per thousand feet f . o. b. 
mill, and the computed total cut. 
The question is frequently asked in connection with lumber pro- 
duction figures as to what part shortleaf pine forms of the total 
