TABLE C DAILY SHIPMENTS OF MUSK MELONS FROM MOAPA, NEVADA, TO ALL MARKETS, WITH NET RETURNS TO THE GROWER 
6 
7 
i 
9 
] 
.0 
] 
.1 
JUL? 
12 
! 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
m 
26 
| 
27 
28 
29 
30 
31 
1 
2 
AUGUST 
4 
s 
s 
Pr. 
Pt>: 
C 
Pr. . 
C 
Pr. • 
C 
Pr. : 
C 
Pr. 
C 
Pr. 
C 
Pr. 
C 
Pr. 
C 
Pr. 
C 
Pr. • 
C 
Pr. : 
C 
Pr. ■ 
C 
Pr. 
C 
Pr. 
C: 
Pr. • 
C: 
Pr. r 
C 
Pr. : 
G 
Pr. 
C 
■ Pr. 
■ C 
• Pr. 
C 
Pr. 
c 
1 Pr. 
G 
Pr. • 
c 
Pr. • 
C 
Pr. 
C 
. p r 
Q 
Pr 
C 
Pr 
rr. 
/i 
Pr. 
TOTAL RECEIPTS 
Billings, Mont. 
S 
P 
I 
I 
i 
1 
t 
* 
$ ,,- 
' 1 
fci.ii 
.71 
1 
$1.00: 
.60 
I 
4 
t 
I 
| .97 
.57 
I 
* 
T: 
t 
k - 
$ 
1 
| .68 
.28 
1 
$ ' 
|- 
» " 
1 
1 
5" — 
Boston, Mass. 
S 
P 
I 
1.46 
1.06 
1 
' 1.48 
1.08 
2 
Butte, Mont. 
s 
p 
1 
.97 
.57 
1 : 
1.20 
' .80 
I 
1.21 
.ei 
1: 
1.21 
.81 
I 
1.12: 
.72 
1 
1,13 
,73 
1: 
.99: 
.59 
1: 
.92 
,52 
1 
.34 
-.06 
I 
.46 
.06 
1 
.25: 
-.15 
1 
12 
Cedar Rapide, la. 
s 
p 
1 
1.09 
.69 
1 
.13 
-.27 
2 
Cheyenne, Wyo. 
s 
p 
1 
1.06 
.66 
1 
.83" 
.43 
1 
.70 
.30 
3 
Chicago, 111. 
s 
p 
2 
.98: 
.58 
2 
1.09 
,69 
l! 
1.07: 
.67 
2 : 
1.10 
.70 
2 
1.19: 
.79 
2 
1.18 
.78 
i 
.96 
.56 
5 
.42 
.02 
1 
.45 
.05 
18 
Cincinnati, 0. 
s 
p 
1 
1.00 
,60 
.96: 
.56 
1 
.96: 
.56 
1: 
.72: 
.32 
1: 
.80: 
.40 
1: 
.60 
.20 
1 
.84 
.84 
6 
Cleveland , 0. 
s 
p 
1 
1.39. 
.99 
l: 
1.26 
.86 
1: 
1.14: 
.74 
1 
1.07 
.67 
1 
.86 
.46 
2 
.51 
.13 
7 
Colorado Springe, Colo. 
s 
p 
1: 
1: 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1.00 
.60 
6 
Creston, la. 
8 
P 
1.00 
,60 
1 
.98 
.58 
1 
Davenport, la. 
S 
P 
1: 
.25 
-.15 
1 
Denver, Colo. 
S 
p 
1: 
1.65 
1.25 
1 
.63 
.23 
1: 
1: 
.78: 
.38 
2; 
.58: 
.18 
1 
.65 
.25 
1: 
.69 
.29 
8 
Dee Moines, la. 
s 
p 
1 
1.08. 
.68 
l 
1.14 
.74 
1 
1.12 
.72 
2! 
1.06 
.66 
2: 
.64 
.24 
) : 
.86 
.46 
1: 
.32 
-.08 
1 
10 
Detroit, Mich. 
s 
p 
1 
1.05 
,65 
1: 
1,01: 
.61 
1: 
li 
.99 
.59 
1: 
.72. 
.32 
2: 
.54 
.14 
7 
Duluth, Minn. 
S 
p 
1: 
.92 
.52 
is 
.63: 
.43 
1: 
.74 
.34 
1: 
.46 
.06 

4 
Fargo, N.Dak. 
s 
p 
1 
1.23 
.83 
1,26 
.86 
1: 
1.1 J 
. 71 
1: 
.96 
. 56 
3 
Great Falls, Mont. 
s 
p 
I 
1.10 
.70 
1 
1.09 
.69 
1: 
1.14: 
.74 
1- 
.86 
.46 
1: 
.94: 
.54 
I 
: .76 
.36 
6 
Helena, Mont. 
s 
p 
1 
1.21 
.81 
1 
1.15 
.75 
1: 
.70 
.30 
1: 
.72 
.32 

4 
Hutchinson, Kens. 
s 
p 
1: 
.76 
.36 
1: 
.79 
,39 
2 
Idaho Falls, Idaho. 
s 
p 
1 
1.16: 
.76 
1 
Indianapolis, Ind. 
s 
p 
1 
1 
Kansas City, Mo. 
s 
p 
.62 
.22 
2 
.74 
.34 
1: 
.73: 
.33 
1: 
,63 
.43 
2: 
.91: 
,51 
l: 
.64: 
.24 
2: 
.72 
.32 
'2'. 
.84 
.44 
2r 
.35? 
-,05' 
4: 
.29 
-.11 
1: 
.22: 
-.18 
1: 
-.09 
-.49 
19 
Lincoln, Nebr. 
s 
p 
I 
.96 
.56 
1 
.59 
.19 
1: 
1.14 
.74 
1 
.94: 
.54 
1: 
,39 
-.01 
1: 
1.05. 
,65 
1: 
.96. 
.56 
1: 
,84 
.44 
1: 
.40: 
.00 
1 
1: 
.87 
.47 
1: 
.69 
.29 
12 
Milwaukee, Wis, 
s 
p 
1 
.96: 
.56 
1: 
.81: 
.41 
li 
.92- 
.52 
.66 
.26 
3 
Minneapolis, Minn. 
s 
p 
1 
1.30 
. 90 
1: 
1.29 
.89 
1: 
1,22 
• 82 
1: 
2: 
1.31 
.91 
H 
1: 
1.14 
.74 
1: 
1.29: 
.89 
2 : 
1.31: 
.91 
2 : 
1.13: 
.73 
3: 
1.19: 
.79 
1: 
.32 
-.08 
1: 
.42: 
.02 
I : 
1: 
1: 
.60 
.20 
21 
Missoula, Mont. 
s 
p 
1 
1: 
1.03 
.63 
2 
Muscatine, la. 
s 
p 
1 
1 
Ogden, Utah. 
s 
p 
I 
1.43 
1.03 
1 
1.33 
.93 
1: 
1.30 
.90 
1: 
1.29 
.89 
L: 
1.22 
.82 
5 
Omaha, Nebr. 
s 
p 
I 
1.09 
.69 
1 
1,10: 
.72 
1: 
1.16: 
.76 
i; 
Is 
1 .10: 
.70 
1; 
1.14: 
.74 
J : 
1 .09 : 
.69 
2: 
1.08 
. .66 
Jft 
.92? 
.52 
Is 
.62: 
.22 
U 
.58 
.18 
li 
.58: 
.18 
2" 
I : 
.82: 
.42 
l: 
.55: 
.15 
1: 
.54 
. 14 
1: 
,79 
• 39 
I: 
.49 
.09 
20 
Peoria, 111. 
s 
p 
li 
.92 
,52 
1: 
.83 
.43 
2 
Pittsburgh, Pa. 
s 
p 
1 
1.08 
.68 
1: 
1.15 
.75 
2: 
1.16: 
.76 
2: 
1.18: 
.78 
2: 
1.01: 
.61 
I: 
1.00: 
.60 
2; 
.93 
• 53 
2: 
,94: 
.54 
2 
.81: 
.41 
3 : 
1.01 
.61 
2: 
.97: 
.57 
21 
.84 
.44 
22 
Pueblo, Colo. 
s 
p 
li 
.55 
.15 
li 
.76 
.36 
1 
2 
St. Paul, Minn. 
s 
p 
1: 
r 
2 
Salt Lake City, Utah. 
s 
p 
1.44: 
1.04 
1: 
1.48: 
1.08 
1: 
1.29: 
.89 
1: 
1.05: 
.65 
1 
.97 
.57 
1: 
2: 
1.16 
.76 
1: 
1.13 
.73 
2: 
1.08: 
.68 
I ! 
1.14 
.74 
2: 
1.12: 
,72 
3 : 
li 
1.05: 
.65 
1'. 
1.08: 
.68 
1: 
1: 
.96: 
.56 
1: 
.78: 
38 
1 
3: 
.80 
.40 
1: 
.89: 
.49 
1 
2 
29 
Sioux City, la. 
s 
p 
l: 
1.28: 
.88 
l! 
1.12: 
.72 
1: 
1.26: 
.86 
1: 
li 
1.11 
.71 
lJ 
1.19 
.78 
i: 
1.18 
.78 
1.14 
.74 
1: 
1.06 
.66 
9 
Springfield, 111. 
s 
p 
.06 
-.34 
Toledo, Ohio. 
s 
p 
1: 
1.18 
.78 
li 
1.15 
,75 
li 
1.27 
.87 
1: 
1.16 
.76 
4 
Topeka, Kane, 
s 
p 
l! 
.74 
.34 
1 
Wichita, Kane. 
s 
p 
1: 
.80 
.40 
1: 
.78 
.38 
l: 
.81 
.41 
It 
"770 
.30 
4 
TOTALS 0 1 2 2 3 3 1 4 4 7 9 15 13 16 17 18 17 15 " 19 15 15 13 , 12 6 12 2 5 4 3 q 2«7 
Explanation of symbols used: 
C - Dally shipments from stations in carlots 
P - (at left) pony crates 
Pr - Price received by growers 
S - (at left) standard crates 
- - Minus sign shows loss to growers 
Office of Markets and Rural Organization, U. S. Department of Agriculture. Bulletin No. 401- 
