28 BULLETIN 1302, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
Table 9. — Associations in leading States, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
1,330 
13.1 
13.1 
1,039 
10.2 
23.3 
879 
8.7 
32.0 
640 
6.3 
38.3 
477 
4.7 
43.0 
475 
4.7 
47.7 
459 
4.5 
52.2 
423 
4.2 
56.4 
420 
4. 1 
60.5 
380 
3.7 
64.2 
376 
3. 7 
67.9 
366 
3.6 
71.5 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
1. Minnesota 
2. Iowa 
3. Wisconsin 
4. Illinois 
5. Nebraska 
6. Missouri 
7. North Dakota 
8. Kansas 
9. Michigan 
10. Ohio 
11. South Dakota. 
12. California 
13. Indiana 
14. New York 
15. Pennsylvania. .. 
16. Texas 
17. Washington 
18. Oklahoma 
19. Arkansas 
20. Tennessee 
All others... 
United States 
301 
277 
232 
L84 
109 
144 
125 
115 
3 19 
3.0 
2.7 
2.3 
1.8 
1.7 
1.4 
1.2 
1.1 
13.3 
74.5 
77.2 
79.5 
81.3 
83.0 
84.4 
85.6 
86.7 
100.0 
Kin 
100.0 
Table 10. — Grain marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
1. Illinois 
397 
345 
337 
326 
309 
268 
215 
196 
12.7 
11.0 
10.7 
10.4 
9.9 
8.5 
6.9 
6.3 
12.7 
23.7 
34.4 
44.8 
54.7 
63.2 
70.1 
76.4 
153 
126 
89 
83 
290 
4.9 
4.0 
2.8 
2.6 
9.3 
81 3 
2. Iowa. 
85.3 
3. Nebraska. . . 
11. Oklahoma 
88. 1 
4. North Dakota 
90.7 
All others. 
100.0 
United States 
7. South Dakota 
8. Ohio 
3,134 
100.0 
Table 11. — Dairy marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
548 
538 
228 
89 
78 
59 
42 
27.9 
27.4 
11.6 
4.5 
4.0 
3.0 
2.1 
27.9 
55. 3 
66.9 
71.4 
75.4 
78.4 
80.5 
42 
41 
28 
273 
2.1 
2.1 
1.4 
13.9 
82.6 
9. Ohio 
84.7 
10. South Dakota 
All others 
86.1 
100.0 
United States 
6. Pennsylvania 
7. Vermont 
1,966 
100.0 
Table 12. — Fruit and vegetable marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
246 
90 
89 
82 
78 
55 
54 
20.0 
7.3 
7.2 
6.6 
6.3 
4.5 
4.4 
20.0 
27.3 
34.5 
41. 1 
47.4 
51.9 
56.3 
8. Washington 
50 
42 
38 
408 
4.1 
3.4 
3.1 
33.1 
60.4 
9. Tennessee 
63.8 
3 New York 
10. Colorado 
66.9 
4. Florida 
All others 
100.0 
United States 
6. Michigan 
1,232 
100.0 
7. Texas 
Table 
13. — Livestock marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
334 
300 
154 
144 
107 
95 
93 
20.9 
18.8 
9.6 
9.0 
6.7 
6.0 
5.8 
20.9 
39.7 
49.3 
58.3 
65.0 
71.0 
76.8 
8. Michigan 
82 
74 
64 
151 
5.1 
4.6 
4.0 
9.5 
81.9 
9. Ohio 
86.5 
10. North Dakota 
90.5 
100.0 
United States 
1,598 
100.0 
7. South Dakota 
