38 
BULLETIX 933, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 
as a wood producer. It is, of course, impossible to get a maximum 
yield of walnuts and of wood at the same time, because the former 
demands a wide spacing that will give low wide-spreading crowns 
exposed to full sunlight, and the latter calls for a closer spacing with 
consequent limitation of the individual crowns and of the amount of 
fruit produced. In the average grove planted for general utility as 
scattered trees or small clumps, the walnuts will be a by-product of 
some value, either for family use or for sale. In some sections the 
growing of trees for the nuts only may be more profitable, and the 
logs produced in small numbers will be of secondary importance. 
Table 18 contains the statistics of the Thirteenth Census (1910) 
upon the production of walnuts. 
Table 18. — Production of walnuts, by States, according to the Thirteenth 
Census (1910). ■ ' 
Stab . 
Alabama 
Arizona 1 
Arkansas 
California. . . 
Colorado 1 
Connecticut 
Delaware.... 
Florida 
Georgia 
Idaho 1 
Illinois 
Indiana 
Iowa 
Bearing 
trees. 
Under 
bearing 
size. 
Bearing 
trees per 
farm re- 
porting. 
Nuts per 
bearing 
tree. 
Kansas 
Kentucky 
Louisiana 
Maine 
Mar yl and 
Massachusetts... 
Michigan 
Minnesota 
Mississippi 
Missouri 
Montana 1 
Nebraska 
Nevada 1 
New Hampshire 
New Jersey 
New Mexico 1 
New York 
North Carolina.. 
North Dakota 1 . . 
Ohio 
Oklahoma 
Oregon 
Pennsylvania . . 
Rhode Island 1 .. 
South Carolina. 
South Dakota.. 
Tennessee 
Texas 
Utah* 
Vermont 
Virginia 
Washington . . . 
West Virginia.. 
Wisconsin 
Wyoming 1 
3,228 
( 2 ) 
9,104 
6,582 
( 2 ) 
3,188 
890 
470 
6,850 
( 2 ) 
44,159 
11,848 
125, 194 
113,537 
14,521 
616 
231 
5,375 
1,910 
16,105 
3,459 
2,914 
85, 330 
( 2 ) 
78, 296 
( 2 ) 
1,518 
4,168 
( 2 ) 
19, 782 
19, 570 
( 2 ) 
8,693 
21,412 
2,024 
65, 075 
( 2 ) 
3,662 
16, 726 
Is, 225 
1,820 
1,704 
23, 049 
1 , 427 
32, 195 
::. 159 
1.753 
5,640 
7,905 
2,636 
554 
2,855 
2, 258 
24,698 
4,822 
24,277 
'8,619 
2,360 
655 
63 
1,522 
434 
3,520 
922 
2,391 
15, 199 
36, 526 
208 
804 
2, 815 
9,180 
3,399 
7,204 
3,405 
22, 193 
2, 258 
10,219 
3,536 
1,206 
253 
9,173 
601 
9,682 
922 
Pounds. 
3. 1 48. 8 
9.2 
27.2 
12.6 
3.4 
2.5 
3.8 
24.7 
12.9 
31.7 
60.6 
15.8 
4.0 
7.2 
5.3 
6.S 
6. .7 
21.9 
3.6 
21.6 
50.4 
9.6 
3.9 
7.0 
5.0 
9.2 
45.6 
7.8 
4.7 
3.7 
54.0 
14.2 
6.5 
15. 5 
8.9 
13.7 
24.4 
10.4 
56.4 
24.2 
14.2 
39.5 
90.7 
62.4 
12.0 
31.9 
9.1 
3.3 
54.8 
88.7 
6.9 
51.2 
20.9 
33.9 
24.9 
52.0 
28.7 
36.3 
23.6 
55.3 
40.8 
4.4 
34.2 
33.3 
50.6 
4.4 
38.9 
30.5 
19.3 
26.1 
30.5 
27.0 
24.9 
Price per 
pound. 
Income 
per tree. 
Cents. . Cents. 
2.2 107.5 
1.5 
1.6 
4.1 
1.6 
1.8 
2.1 
1.4 
1.2 
1.8 
1.6 
1.4 
1.8 
3.1 
1.1 
3.0 
1.4 
1.9 
2.4 
1.0 
2.3 
2.8 
1.8 
2.5 
1.5 
1.3 
1.7 
1.9 
1.8 
2.0 
2.0 
1.3 
l.S 
2.2 
1.6 
1.6 
1.3 
1.9 
84.5 
37.5 
58.2 
63.2 
163.3 
131.0 
16.8 
38.2 
16.4 
4.8 
76.7 
159.5 
21.4 
56.4 
62.7 
16.8 
47.3 
124.8 
28.7 
11.3 
24.6 
65.4 
59.0 
83.0 
53.0 
7.5 
65.0 
60.0 
101.2 
8.8 
50.5 
55.0 
42.5 
41.7 
48.6 
35.5 
47.3 
i Species reported as occurring, bu1 no fun her informal ion available. 
2 Reported. 
3 Although they are not reported in the census, i here an' bearing trees with salable product in Utah. 
1 N'ot reported* 
