28 
BULEETIX 813, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. 
Table VI. — Summarized statement of the average annual production of 117 individual 
lemon trees oftfa Eureka variety for which detailed performance records were obtained for 
the 6-year period from July. 1911, to June, 1917, inclusive — Continued. 
Strain. 
Tree designa- 
tion. 
Average annual crop production. 
Seeds. 
Rant. 
Weight. 
Xumber. 
Green 
grade. 
Variable 
fruits. 
per 
! fruit. 
57 
58 
59 
60 
61 
Eureka 
do 
34-74-17 
34-75- 5 
34-76-12 
*34-74- S 
34-76- " 
34-76-10 
*34-74-15 
34-71 
34-77- 7 
*34-73-16 
34-75-36 
34-75- 3 
34-74-5( 
34-75- 7 
*34-74-ll 
*34-73- 5 
34-73- 4 
34-75- 9 
34-7"- 1 
34-77- 9 
34-75-10 
34-77-13 
34-74- 2 
34-74- 9 
*34-75- § 
34-75-17 
34-76- 9 
34-74- 4 
31-76- 7 
34-73- 2 
34-7 <- 5 
*34-77- 6 
34-76-14 
J34-' " . 
34-73-15 
34-74- 3 
*34-75-13 
34-76- 
*34-74-12 
34-74-54 
34-74-47 
34-74- 5 
*34-75- 6 
34-77-14 
34-74-51 
*34-74-13 
34-75-14 
*34-77-10 
34-75-15 
34-75-52 
34-75-42 
t34-73-22 
*34-76-56 
34-77- 4 
34-73- 3 
*34-76- 3 
34-77-23 
34-76- 4 
+34-73-40 
i34-75-37 
*f -4-74-40 
Pounds. 
207. 2S 
205. 56 
202. 90 
201.24 
200.14 
• 199. 2S 
197. 53 
197. 42 
194. 76 
193. 72 
190.05 
189. 6S 
188.16 
187.15 
1>4. >9 
184. 64 
183.71 
183. 44 
183. 42 
183. 42 
-182.20 
182.18 
ISO. 49 
ISO. 27 
179. 22 
178.54 
178.49 
176. 43 
171.88 
171.23 
171.22 
169. 07 
165.86 
160. 28 
155. 93 
158. 06 
156. 72 
154.61 
148.29 
147. 55 
146.53 
145. 72 
145. 61 
142.29 
136. 60 
136. 14 
132. 74 
122. 55 
121. OS 
117.98 
115. 15 
112. 89 
111. 14 
110. 29 
107. 77 
97.74 
89. 01 
50. 90 
69. SO 
63.63 
51. 23 
945. 67 
970. 00 
883. S3 
S34. 00 
9S0.50 
S73. 50 
S04. 17 
S70. 33 
926.83 
b ; " 
- 
891.33 
751.33 
S45. 17 
S37.17 
S42. 33 
S26. 17 
828.17 
860.00 
820.67 
SOS. 50 
804.33 
842. 17 
831.00 
823. S3 
820. 33 
701. 83 
S04. S3 
755. 17 
847. 00 
803.50 
847. 00 
671.20 
652. 00 
702.00 
659. 00 
760. 67 
621. 17 
617. 00 
604.00 
568. 50 
693.83 
592. -3 
599. 17 
553. 33 
554.00 
605.33 
491. 17 
490. S3 
479.00 
187 
470. 50 
429. 83 
404.17 
356. 00 
342.33 
308. 00 
290. 60 
245. 20 
Per cent. 
64.3 
59.0 
66. 5 
J5. 7 
54. 5 
69.7 
78. _ 
54^4 
71.6 
64.1 
62.0 
87.2 
60.1 
63.9 
68.0 
65.3 
64.9 
64.0 
58.9 
65.9 
69.4 
65.9 
64.2 
61.0 
62.3 
61.3 
89.7 
59.7 
69.4 
48.5 
54.7 
64.6 
76. v 
80.2 
64.4 
77.4 
56.4 
77.4 
84.2 
S3. 2 
89.6 
58.4 
73. 5 
S3. 
75.2 
46.6 
76. 2 
82. 
68.7 
79.5 
71.9 
85.0 
82.2 
80. 4 
77.1 
81.4 
70. 2 
61.0 
53.7 
Per cent. 
7.2 
9.3 
7.5 
9.8 
5. 7 
v. 2 
13.8 
6.3 
5.6 
11.2 
8.2 
11.3 
12.9 
7.0 
50. 4 
15.8 
15.1 
6.1 
8.0 
2.9 
7.9 
6.9 
8.9 
10.6 
6.4 
6.4 
6.2 
13.2 
7.5 
7.9 
4.9 
6.9 
8.9 
15.6 
20.6 
9.6 
15.4 
7.7 
16.2 
16.2 
22 . 2 
17.0 
8.5 
12.7 
17.1 
18.0 
14.2 
,. 7 
16.6 
10.4 
11.3 
17.6 
17.5 
9.0 
26.2 
18.8 
14.6 
21.3 
19.0 
15.4 
13.4 
4.88 
7.86 
7.91 
6.23 
7.23 
7 
6^ 
do 
63 
64 
Shade Tree 
5-1C 
Eureka 
65 
do 
9. 0° 
66 
67 
Dense Productive 
Eureka 
7.05 
7.18 
68 
69 
do 
Shade Tree 
6.35 
1 11 
70 
6.64 
71 
1 77 
72 
73 
Eureka 
do 
6.19 
74 
do 
...do 
7.91 
7 8° 
76 
do 
7. S3 
77 
7- 
79 
do 
Small Open 
do 
7.99 
6.49 
9 41 
80-. 
- }5 
81 
7 77 
83 
4.70 
S3 
do 
S4 
Shade Tree 
0. 67 
85 
7 80 
86 
87 
Small Open 
7.92 
8.27 
88 
89 
do 
-.32 
. -7 
90 
Shade Tree 
1.92 
91 
92 
93 
do 
Small Open 
Shade Tree 
1.35 
4. 72 
5-28 
94 
6. 92 
95----.-- 
96--- 
Shade Tree 
4.43 
0.97 
97 
do 
1.59 
98--- 
do 
99 
*8 
100 
101 
Dense Unproductive.. 
Shade Tree 
1.16 
102 
103 
do 
..do 
0.9S 
1 48 
104 
Pear Shape 
2.9a 
105. 
Shade Tree 
106. . . 
do 
1.43 
107 
...do 
1.74 
108 
109 
110 
Ill 
do 
do 
Dense Unproductive. - 
1.26 
L.83 
1.72 
2.00 
112 
113 
do 
...do 
2. 01 
2. 09 
114 . 
do 
1.57 
115 
116. 
do 
. do 
1.34 
2. 67 
117 
do 
2. 92 
To indicate more fully and definitely the actual variations of the 
different trees and their relative values to the investigator and the 
grower, it is necessary to consider the records of actual production of 
the individual trees. The number of trees included in this study and 
the mass of data obtained from them make it impracticable to present 
