l 
NATURAL REGENERATION OF DOUGLAS FIR, 61 
HorMann, Jutius V. A forest saved is a forest grown. West Coast Lumber- 
man, vol. 29, No. 465, pp. 24-5, 50, Feb. 15, 1921. 
The impprtance of seed characteristics in the natural reproduction of 
coniferous forests. Studies in the Biological Sciences, No. 2, Univ. 
of Minn. 1918. 
How to obtain a second crop of Douglas fir. The Timberman, Vol. 
XXII, No. 5, March, 1920. 
Adaptation in Douglas fir. Ecology, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 127-81. April, 
1921. 
Hopkins, A. D. Insect enemies of forest reproduction, Yearbook, U. S. De 
partment of Agriculture, 1905. 
Practical information on the Scolytid beetles of North American 
Forests—Bark beetles of the genus Dendroctonus, U. S. Department 
of Agriculture, Bureau-of Entomology Bulletin 83, Part I. 1909. 
Jupp, C. 8S. Douglas fir and fire. Proc. Soc. Am. For., vol. 10, pp. 186-191, 
April, 1915. i 
Kewioae, R. S. Douglas fir, the timber of the future. Pioneer Western Lum- 
berman, San Francisco, vol. 56, No. 3, p. 17, Aug. 1, 1911. 
KIRKLAND, Burt P. Cost of growing Douglas fir timber on medium-quality 
forest soils. The Timberman, vol. 15, No. 9, p. 33, July, 1914. 
KNAPP, JOSEPH BurRKE. Fire-killed Douglas fir. A study of its rate of deterio- 
ration, usability, and strength. U. 8S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest 
Service Bulletin 112. 1912. 
KRAEBEL, C..J. Choosing the best tree seeds: ‘The influence of parental 
character and environment upon the progeny of Douglas fir. Journal 
of Heredity, vol. 8, No. 11, pp. 483-492, Nov., 1917. 
LAMB, F. H. Root suckers on Douglas Fir. Bot. Gaz., vol. 28, pp. 69-70, 
July, 1899. 
Lewis, R. G. Commercial importance of Douglas fir. Can. Lumberman, 
Toronto, vol. 34, No. 14, pp. 34-85, July 15, 1914. 
Luioyp, F. E. The Douglas spruce. Plant World, Tucson, vol. 3, pp. 65-68, 
85-87, 1900. 
MILLER, J. M. Oviposition of Megastigmus spermotrophus in the seed of 
Douglas fir. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Jour. of Agric. Research, vol. 
6, No. 2, pp. 65-68, Apr. 10, 1916. 
Insect damage to the cones and seeds of Pacific Coast conifers. Bul- 
letin 95, U. S. Department of Agriculture, 1914. 
MuNGER, THORNTON T. Natural versus artificial regeneration in the Douglas 
fir region of the Pacific Coast. Proce. Soc. of Am. For., Washington, 
D. C., vol. 7, pp. 187-96. 1912. 
An expert says that natural reforestation ae fir is very feasible. Pac. 
Lum. Trade Jour., Seattle, vol. 18, No. 11, p. 41, March 1913. 
Five years’ growth on Douglas fir sample Tete Proce. Soe. Am. For., 
Washington, D. C., vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 423-5. Oct., 1915. 
Growth of Douglas fir. The Timberman, vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 50, Sep- 
tember, 1915. 
Parch blight on Douglas fir in the Pacific Northwest. Plant World, 
Tucson, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 46-7, Feb., 1916. 
Productive capacity of the Douglas fir lands. Univ. of Cal. Jour. of 
Agr., Berkeley, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 92-3, Nov., 1916. 
Growth of Douglas fir. The Timberman, vol. 16, No. 11, Sept., 1915, 
and vol. 18, No. 7, May, 1917. 
Reforesting essential to welfare of Oregon. Pioneer West. Lumberman, 
San Francisco, vol. 68, No. 7. Oct. 1, 1917. 
Observations on the growth of Douglas fir. The Timberman, vol. 18, 
INO? i Di 4a.) May, tO: 
Local application of Colonel Graves’s ‘“ forest policy.” Lumber World 
Rev., Chicago, vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 88-90. Nov. 10, 1919. 
Second measurement of permanent sample plots of Douglas fir on the 
west slope of the Cascades in Oregon. Jour. of For., vol. 18, No. 8, 
pp. 833-836, December, 1920. 
Growth and management of Douglas fir in the Pacific Northwest. U. S. 
Dept. of Agri., Forest Service Circular 175. 1911. 
PErRcE, Hart 8. The regeneration of denuded areas in the Bighorn Mountains 
by Douglas fir. For. Quart., Washington, D. C., vol. 13, pp. 301-307, 
Sept., 1915. 
