PRODUCTION OF MILK OF LOW BACTERIAL CONTENT. 61 
been studied, nor has the influence of general conditions of cleanliness 
surrounding the production of milk been given consideration. 
LITERATURE CITED. 
(1) Stecki1ne, W. A., Jr. 
1906. Quality of milk affected by common dairy practices. Conn. 
(Storrs) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 42. 
(2) NortH, CHARLES E. . 
1908. A method of milk production. In Med. Rec. [N. Y.], v. 73, no. 7, 
p. 263-266. 
1917. A survey of dairy score cards. Jn Amer. Jour. Pub. Health, v. 7, 
no. 1, p. 25-39. 
(3) PrucHa, M. J., HArpiInG, H. A., and WEETER, H. M. 
1915. Utensils as a source of bacterial contamination of milk. In 
Science, N. S., v. 42, no. 1080, p. 353. 
(4) ScHROEDER, E. C. 
1910. The relation of the tuberculous cow to public health. Jn U. S. 
Dept. Agr. Bur. Anim. indus. 25th Ann. Rpt., 1908, p. 109-153. 
(5) Srockine, W. A., Jr. 
1907. Comparative studies with covered milk pails. (Conn. (Storrs) 
Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 48. 
(6) Harpine, H. A., Witson, J. K., and Smiru, G. A. 
1910. The modern milk pail. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 326. 
(7) Lamson, R. W. 
1914. Inexpensive aids in producing sanitary milk. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta. 
Bul. 181. 
(8) CAMPBELL, H. C. 
1916. Comparison of the bacterial count: of milk with the sediment or 
dirt test. U.S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bul. 361. 
(9) Harpine, H. A., RUEHLE, G. L., Witson, J. K., and Smiru, G. A. 
1913. The effect of certain dairy operations upon the germ content of. 
milk. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 365. 
(10) RUEHLE, G. L. A., and Kup, W. L. 
1915. Germ eortoat of stable air and its effect upon the germ content 
of milk. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 409, 
(11) Prucua, M. J., and Weerer, H. M. 
1917. Univ. of Ill. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 199. 
