28 BULLETIN 1302, TJ. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 
Table 9. — Associations in leading States, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
1. Minnesota 
1,330 
1,039 
879 
640 
477 
475 
459 
423 
420 
380 
376 
366 
13.1 
10.2 
8.7 
6.3 
4.7 
4.7 
4.5 
4.2 
4.1 
3.7 
3.7 
3.6 
13.1 
23.3 
32.0 
38.3 
43.0 
47.7 
52.2 
56.4 
60.5 
64.2 
67.9 
71.5 
301 
277 
232 
184 
169 
144 
125 
115 
1,349 
3.0 
2.7 
2.3 
1.8 
1.7 
1.4 
1.2 
1.1 
13.3 
74.5 
2. Iowa 
77.2 
3. Wisconsin 
15. Pennsylvania 
16. Texas 
79.5 
4. Illinois. 
81.3 
5. Nebraska 
83.0 
6. Missouri- _ 
84.4 
7. North Dakota 
85.6 
8. Kansas _. 
86.7 
9. Michigan 
All others 
100.0 
10 Ohio 
United States. ■... 
11. South Dakota 
10, 160 
100.0 
Table 10. — Grain marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
397 
345 
337 
326 
309 
268 
215 
196 
12.7 
11.0 
10.7 
10.4 
9.9 
8.5 
6.9 
6.3 
12.7 
23.7 
34.4 
44.8 
54.7 
63.2 
70.1 
76.4 
153 
126 
89 
83 
290 
4.9 
4.0 
2.8 
2.6 
9.3 
81 3 
2. Iowa 
85.3 
3. Nebraska... . 
88. 1 
4. North Dakota 
12. Michigan.. . 
90.7 
5. Kansas .. 
All others 
100.0 
United States 
7. South Dakota 
8. Ohio 
3,134 
100.0 
Table 11. — Dairy marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
548 
538 
228 
89 
78 
59 
42 
27.9 
27.4 
11.6 
4.5 
4.0 
3.0 
2.1 
27.9 
55.3 
66.9 
71.4 
75.4 
78.4 
80.5 
42 
41 
28 
273 
2.1 
2.1 
1.4 
13.9 
82.6 
9. Ohio 
84.7 
3. Iowa 
10. South Dakota 
All others 
86.1 
4. Michigan... 
100.0 
United States 
6. Pennsylvania 
7. Vermont 
1,966 
100.0 
Table 12. — Fruit and vegetable marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
1. California 
246 
90 
89 
82 
78 
55 
54 
20.0 
7.3 
7.2 
6.6 
6.3 
4.5 
4.4 
20.0 
27.3 
34.5 
41.1 
47.4 
51.9 
56.3 
8. Washington. 
50 
42 
38 
408 
4.1 
3.4 
3.1 
33.1 
60.4 
2. Arkansas 
9. Tennessee 
63.8 
3. New York .. 
66.9 
4. Florida 
All others 
100.0 
United States 
6. Michigan. 
1,232 
100.0 
7. Texas 
Table 
13. — Livestock marketing associations, March, 1924 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
State and rank 
Num- 
ber 
Per 
cent 
Cumu- 
lative 
per cent 
334 
300 
154 
144 
107 
95 
93 
20.9 
18.8 
9.6 
9.0 
6.7 
6.0 
5.8 
20.9 
39.7 
49.3 
58.3 
65.0 
71.0 
76.8 
8. Michigan 
82 
74 
64 
151 
5.1 
4.6 
4.0 
9.5 
81.9 
9. Ohio 
86.5 
10. North Dakota 
All others 
90.5 
100.0 
United States 
1,598 
100.0 
7. South Dakota 
